|
|
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 4, 2001
A Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was held in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Tuesday, September 4, 2001. Chairwoman Strom called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
PRAYER The Prayer was given by Falk.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL Present were Councilmen Falk, Fiore, Hall, Kaupin, Mangini, Strom, Tait, and Vayda. Councilmen Egan, Giddings, and Mangini were absent. Also present were Town Manager, Scott A. Shanley; Assistant Town Manager, Daniel T. Vindigni; Director of Finance, Gregory R. Simmons; Revenues Collector, Suzanne R. Longo; Director of Public Works, John J. Kazmarski; Director of Community Development, Laura Watson; Town Clerk, Suzanne F. Olechnicki.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #5440 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Vayda to accept the minutes of the August 20, 2001 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5440 adopted 7-0-1, with Councilman Mangini abstaining.
MOTION #5441 by Councilman Vayda, seconded by Councilman Tait to accept the minutes of the August 20, 2001 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5441 adopted 7-0-1, with Councilman Mangini abstaining.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Present from the Greater Hartford Transit District was Art Hammon.
Mr. Hammon stated he is present at the request of Mary Ann Hillis. He noted Ms. Hillis feels Enfield and other towns could benefit by a service similar to whats being proposed in downtown Hartford. He explained this proposal calls for a 3 ½ mile loop. He pointed out such a service would not be at an excessive cost. He noted he would be happy to assist the Town in looking at such a service.
Councilman Fiore questioned whether the Council could have a more formal presentation at a future date. Mr. Hammon responded hed be pleased to come at any time. Chairwoman Strom noted this can be worked out between the Town Manager and the Greater Hartford Transit District.
Councilman Mangini suggested inviting Mary Ann Hillis to the formal presentation when its scheduled.
Robert Patti, 12 Southview Street
Stated Southview residents do not believe that creating a cul-de-sac on Southview will set a precedent. He referred to a fatality in this area and noted this would be an opportunity to correct a wrong. He stated his hope the Town will consider creating a cul-de-sac on Southview Street.
John DAleo and Carlene Casarella (business owners on Enfield Street)
Mr. DAleo stated sidewalks and islands in front of his property will hinder people attempting to enter and exit his business. He urged the Town Council vote against this proposal. Mr. DAleo pointed out his business has adequate space to park without parking on sidewalks. He added sidewalks placed in front of the businesses do not delineate to pedestrians to watch for traffic.
Ms. Casarella stated she runs an income tax business on Enfield Street and 65% of her business comes from the elderly. She voiced concern about this proposal as concerns the safety of these elderly customers as they attempt to enter and leave her business on Enfield Street. She pointed out up until now theyve never had an accident. She stated she has no problem with pavers or blacktop, but the curbing will make it difficult to park and turn around. She added Mr. DAleos business has large trucks coming and going, and this proposal will make their access difficult.
Walter Bosco, 744 Enfield Street
Stated his belief curbing will create problems and traffic hazards. He stated his belief just blacktop or pavers would be better.
Matt Porcello, Enfield Street
Noted he has three properties on Enfield Street, and hes concerned about vehicles parking at the island area. He commended Messrs. Kazmarski and McAlmond in attempting to make things work. He pointed out at 718 Enfield Street the sidewalk comes down at an angle, and he feels it would be more practical to come straight across and let the angle of the sidewalks be at the entrance of the impound area. He stated islands are not practical.
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Schaefer, 740 Enfield Street
Noted they own Awards and More. Mr. Schaefer stated they need their current turning room. He pointed out that by installing any kind of obstruction in front of 740 Enfield Street, a problem would be created. He stated his belief this area should be completely flat.
Mrs. Shaefer pointed out there are businesses on Enfield Street that let the grass in front of their businesses grow too high. She stated her belief if an island is installed in front of their business, they will lose two parking spaces. She acknowledged continuity is nice, however, the frontage in front of these businesses is not the same.
Randy Daigle, 3 Roseanne Street
Commended everyone for approving the installation of skateboard parks. He noted the parks are well run by good staff.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Councilman Kaupin stated he received a letter in August regarding Dial-A-Ride and the fee charged to participants. He noted if someone comes into the program halfway through the year, they have to pay the full fee. He stated the question was raised as to how this decision was arrived at. Mr. Shanley suggested this question be referred to the Bus Committee.
MOTION #5442 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Tait to suspend the rules to address Items e., f., and g., under Items for Discussion after Item #9 on the agenda.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5442 adopted 8-0-0.
Councilman Mangini requested the knocked down street sign on the corner of Hazard Avenue and Middle Road be fixed.
Councilman Mangini stated she received a concern from 2 Colonial Drive regarding proper placement of trash barrels after emptying. She added this same resident also has a plowing issue.
Councilman Mangini thanked Mr. Vindigni for his attention to the tree issue at 203 Hazard Avenue.
Councilman Mangini noted the players at Powder Hollow are very appreciative of the scoreboard light fixture for their playing field.
Councilman Hall pointed out that one of the skateboard park fixtures has a turned up lip which creates a hazard for skateboarders. Mr. Vindigni indicated hed contact the manufacturer regarding this.
Councilman Hall questioned whether the gravel being put down in the process of sealing roads will be cleaned up. She noted the Green Manor area has large deposits of gravel. Mr. Kazmarski stated Public Works is in the process of cleaning up this gravel right now.
Councilman Fiore noted the storm drains on Roosevelt and Till have been clogged up by gravel from roadwork.
Councilman Falk thanked Mr. Vindigni for working with the President of the Womens Softball League regarding their field.
Councilman Falk thanked Mr. Vindigni for his regular updates.
Councilman Falk pointed out if the Council had retained sweeping in their budget back in May, they could have been maintaining the roads all along.
Chairwoman Strom commended the Police Department for getting its re-accreditation status. She pointed out Enfield is one of the few towns in Connecticut that has an accredited police department.
TOWN MANAGER AND TOWN ATTORNEY REPORTS
There were no reports this evening.
REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL
Councilman Falk spoke regarding the Indoor Recreation Committee. He noted at the end of the school year a questionnaire was sent home with the children. He stated the data was consolidated, and the Recreation Director is going through that data to learn what the major concerns might be concerning indoor recreation. He commended the Recreation Director for doing a great job in putting together this questionnaire.
DISCUSSION/RESOLUTION RE: ACCEPTANCE SCHOOL BID PACKAGE #1
Present from the School Building Committee was Chairman Randy Daigle. Also present was Gregg Smolley from Jeter, Cook & Jepson.
Mr. Daigle distributed the tally for the bids on Package #1, which includes Barnard, Parkman, Whitney, and Hazardville Memorial Schools. He noted W.J. Monford was the apparent low bidder. He stated the Committee is comfortable that this contractor is capable. He pointed out this same contractor did the work at the Thomas Alcorn School. He stated the Committee recommends the Town Council allow the Town Manager to proceed with contract negotiations with the apparent low bidder of W.J. Monford.
Councilman Falk questioned when the architectural plans were put together, was the Committee able to include everything that was intended to be included before the referendum was held. Mr. Daigle responded yes. He explained the Committee met with the users, and they feel they met all the program needs and requirements. He added they are under budget more so than they initially thought. He pointed out if there are any leftover monies, they would like to apply them toward the SF&E package.
DISCUSSION/RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF BID DOCUMENTS/SCHOOL BID PACKAGE #2
Mr. Daigle stated Bid Package #2 includes Crandall, Hale and Stowe. He noted they have received approval from the Board of Education and would like the Town Council to approve this package to go out to bid on September 11th, with a bid opening scheduled for October 2nd. He pointed out nothing has been changed from the last presentation.
Councilman Fiore questioned if the parking at Crandall has been resolved. Mr. Smolley stated a set of plans was sent to the Planning Department to show the difference in the proposed parking. He noted they are waiting to hear back from Planning. He stated what they see as potential changes is relatively non-existent.
Mr. Daigle stated they are looking to the Town Council and the Board of Education to help set a date for a groundbreaking ceremony for Package #1.
DISCUSSION RE: APPROVAL SENIOR CENTER BID DOCUMENTS
Mr. Shanley stated the Town Council received a briefing on the status of the Senior Center. He noted theyre looking for the authority from the Town Council to go out to bid, and they are hoping the bid can go out by September 14th to come back by October 16th.
Councilman Falk stated he is comfortable in moving forward.
MOTION #5443 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Fiore to suspend the rules to address Items e., f., and g., under Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5443 adopted 8-0-0.
OLD BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
All Town Council appointments remained tabled.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN MANAGER)
MOTION #5444 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to accept the Town Managers recommendation to remove Item #7 from the table. (Commission on Aging appointment)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5444 adopted 8-0-0.
MOTION #5445 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Falk to accept the recommendation of the Town Manager to reappoint Ruth E. Porcello (D) to the Commission on Aging for a term which expires 12/31/2003.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5445 adopted 8-0-0.
All other Town Manager appointments remained tabled.
Item c. remained tabled.
MOTION #5446 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Mangini to remove Item d. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5446 adopted 8-0-0.
MOTION #5447 by Councilman Vayda, seconded by Councilman Hall to waive the reading of the resolution.
(A Resolution re: Charge for Enfield Revitalization and Related Committees)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5447 adopted 8-0-0.
AMENDMENT #1 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to add a sentence to the end of the sixth paragraph of the resolution as follows:
“In addition, the Town Council shall strive to balance the membership to reflect the community as a whole.”
Councilman Fiore stated he would like to see the following wording added to the middle of the sixth paragraph as follows:
“…consisting of membership that shall not exceed 21 persons and not to exceed a maximum of seven people per voting district…”
Councilman Kaupin stated his belief it would be difficult to narrow down a certain number from particular districts. He added his feeling this may be too bureaucratic and complicated. He noted he likes Councilman Falks amendment because it provides more flexibility while they strive for diversity.
Councilman Mangini agreed with Councilman Kaupin, however, she likes the amendment being proposed by Councilman Fiore. She pointed out that with the projects that theyre trying to accomplish, ideally it would be good to have a good sampling from all parts of town to balance the pros and cons of these projects. She noted if there are specifics and guidelines, the Town Council would have a better direction as to what and where to look for the sampling that the Council is required to look for.
Chairwoman Strom stated a compromise would be, “In addition, the Council shall strive to have not more than seven members from any one voting district”, as opposed to locking in that number. She noted when a number is final, there may have to be all kinds of contortions that have to be gone through to override it.
Councilman Mangini stated Chairwoman Stroms suggestion is a reasonable compromise.
Councilman Falk stated the whole logic is not to get locked into a number because there are times when the Council has a difficult time filling vacancies on various committees.
Councilman Fiore agreed Chairwoman Stroms suggestion is a good compromise.
AMENDMENT 1A by Chairwoman Strom, seconded by Councilman Fiore.
“In addition, the Council shall strive to appoint not more than seven members from any one voting district in order to balance the membership to reflect the community as a whole”.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1A adopted 8-0-0.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1 defeated 0-8-0.
Referring to the first sentence in Item A. under the seventh paragraph, Councilman Mangini questioned if this is a budgetary concern, or is this a Council policy-making decision. She questioned how the new Revitalization Committee will address the Main Street Program, i.e., is it exploratory, or are they looking for seed money. Mr. Shanley stated it would be exploratory through research and perhaps they would visit communities that have had some experience with this, and in the end a recommendation would be made to the Council as to what should be done.
AMENDMENT #2 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Falk to add the following wording to Item B. under the seventh paragraph:
“…developing a plan to implement and promote the Village District designations of Thompsonville and Hazardville, in addition to the Route 5 section of North Thompsonville in a manner that encourages revitalization efforts.”
Chairwoman Strom stated in order to be a village district, it would really need to go through Planning & Zoning. She stated her belief Hazardville is mentioned because they are already looking to be incorporated into their new ordinance when it comes out. She stated there are special districts, but she does not believe that every area theyre looking to revitalize is a village district. She agreed a lot of effort has to be put into the Route 5 section of North Thompsonville, however, she doesnt see this area being designated as a village district.
Councilman Kaupin stated his belief Councilman Fiores intent is covered under Item C. since Item B. is specifically identifying a village district. He pointed out the Route 5 section of North Thompsonville is a business local area.
Councilman Fiore stated he is trying to avoid sending an incorrect message by omitting mention of the Route 5 section of North Thompsonville.
Councilman Mangini stated her belief the North Thompsonville area should be mentioned in either Item B. or C. because of the current Northgate project theyre working on.
Councilman Kaupin suggested the following wording for Item A:
…”systemic and professional approach to commercial and residential revitalization within Enfields villages and neighborhoods, including Hazardville, Thompsonville, and North Thompsonville.”
Councilman Fiore and Falk withdrew AMENDMENT #2.
AMENDMENT #2 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Fiore to add the following wording to Item A. under the seventh paragraph:
…”systemic and professional approach to commercial and residential revitalization within Enfields villages and neighborhoods, including Hazardville, Thompsonville, and North Thompsonville.”
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #2 adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5448 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Tait.
(Re: Charge for Enfield Revitalization and Related Committees) Copy Appended
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5448 adopted 8-0-0, as amended.
Item e. remained tabled.
NEW BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
The appointment to the Cultural Arts Commission remained on the agenda.
DISCUSSION RE: DRAINAGE/HEAD START BUILDING
Mr. Shanley stated at the September 17th meeting Jeter, Cook & Jepson will be present to do a presentation and explain the differences in the drainage options, as well as prices.
Chairwoman Strom stated a decision will have to be made at that meeting because it will be going before Planning & Zoning.
Councilman Tait questioned if there was some legal issue about using project funds vs not using project funds to go outside the property. Mr. Shanley stated there will need to be a legal answer to that question.
DISCUSSION/RESOLUTION RE: SUSAN CIRCLE
Chairwoman Strom questioned whether its necessary to have a resolution to authorize an appraisal. Mr. Shanley responded no. Chairwoman Strom questioned the timetable for getting an appraisal back. Mr. Shanley noted they will check into that.
Councilman Hall questioned if the appraiser could also provide an appraisal with the property repaired. She stated her belief an appraisal on the property is going more toward liening the property for their portion of the repair and to verify equity in the property.
It was the consensus of the Council that the Town should explore the current equity the owners have in the property. Chairwoman Strom noted at that time, they could also look at direct assessment.
Councilman Tait stated his recollection this was to be an interest free loan and he does not see this in the resolution. Chairwoman Strom noted she has no problem with that. It was the consensus of the Council that this would be an interest free loan.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION RE: SUSPENSE LIST OF TAXES
This item will appear under New Business on the next agenda.
MOTION #5449 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to suspend the rules to address Item b. under Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5449 adopted 8-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: HAZARDVILLE STREETSCAPE
Mr. Shanley clarified his memorandum. He stated there was a base bid received on Friday on the core area of the project. He noted that bid included paver sidewalks, electric conduit underneath, the concrete light bases, benches, planters, urns, street signs, barrels, all paver treatments around the amenities. He stated this was all included in the core bid of $254,555. He pointed out that did not include streetlights and on-street parking improvements. He stated on a linear foot basis, that comes out to about $77 per linear foot.
Mr. Shanley stated the Hazardville Village Subcommittee put together a package that outlined the various options for lights. He noted the most cost effective was the purchase option. He noted if the Council were to do this, they would have to add about $150,000 to this base bid in order to have the core streetscape as spelled out in the plan and lights. He noted this cost added to the core bid would amount to $404,555, not including on-street parking. He stated they would have to include inspection services and testing for the pavers. He pointed out compaction is the key element and it has to be done right, and it would have to be tested frequently. He stated that would be about $25,000 total and with a contingency of $30,000, the total figure would be $459,555 for the core area with lighting, but not on-street parking.
Mr. Shanley stated before there was a discussion of a streetscape, the Town Council approved the Road 2000 sidewalk and road maintenance plan, and in that, the Town Council told them that of the $15 million dollars, approximately $1.2 million dollars was going to be for improving sidewalks throughout town. He stated they commissioned a study, and the study identified the poor, fair, and good sidewalks in town, and the Council stated they should start with the poor sidewalks.
He stated the Hazardville Village sidewalks were identified as poor sidewalks, therefore, their plan at the time was to replace the sidewalks. He pointed out there was no discussion about the streetscape, but just the replacement of the sidewalk. He stated at that time the Council authorized $5.50/square foot from the Road 2000 referendum to do the sidewalks at approximately 44,000 square feet, and this came out to about $240,000. He noted in the $1.2 million dollars for sidewalks all around town, that was approximately how much was set aside to do that very long stretch through Hazardville Village. He stated the square footage in just the core area comes to $84,000 from the Road 2000 sidewalk fund. He noted there is also available approximately $350,000 in the capital fund specifically for Hazardville streetscape, which is for all the amenities above and beyond the $5.50/sq. ft. sidewalk. He noted that totals $434,000.
Councilman Falk referred to the consultant that worked with the Town in coming up with a design and questioned if the cost of the consultant comes out of this money as well. Mr. Shanley stated the cost for the consultant was already deducted.
Councilman Kaupin stated his belief its important they replace the entire length of sidewalks because of the condition theyre in. Mr. Shanley stated they received a unit price for the core area, and they would need to work with the contractor to get pricing for the entire length.
Councilman Kaupin stated they need to determine the extent of the lighting. He added he doesnt necessarily feel that the entire district needs lights, but he believes lighting is important in the core area, and possibly extending a little past the core. He stated his belief it would be nice to have lighting in front of the park and St. Marys Church.
Councilman Mangini questioned if theyve been in touch with the business owners regarding going through their driveways with these sidewalks. Mr. Shanley stated the last time this was discussed, they said they would have an advisory meeting. He noted once its decided what the plan is, they can have those meetings.
Councilman Mangini stated her understanding some business owners dont want the sidewalks going through their driveways. She questioned if there will be a legal concern to consider if business owners dont want the sidewalks. Mr. Shanley pointed out the sidewalk would be on public property. Councilman Mangini questioned whos responsible for maintenance of that sidewalk, and Mr. Shanley responded the property owner as is the case everywhere.
Councilman Mangini questioned if the Town needs to approach the business owners and get permission. Mr. Shanley stated the Town does have the right to put a sidewalk on public property. He noted they could go to the business community to specifically ask them what they want. Councilman Mangini stated she would like that because she does not feel comfortable making a decision for these businesses.
Councilman Vayda stated his belief they should look at continuity in this area and develop a plan that is consistent and makes a lot of sense for the area.
Councilman Falk stated he is concerned about sidewalks crossing the driveways of businesses. He noted a business snowplowing over these walks may cause deterioration of the walkway eventually.
Councilman Hall agreed with Councilman Kaupins suggestion of doing the entire strip for sidewalks. She added she also likes the idea of doing the core with the lighting and the proposed streetscape.
Mr. Shanley questioned if it would be acceptable to meet with a couple Council members so that they can review the map to define exactly what is being talked about so that there is no miscommunication and from there they will attempt to cost this out, as well as meet with their contractor to see if they can make that happen.
Councilman Hall stated this project has been going on for three years and she believes the businesses have been involved in the on-going process. She noted invitations have gone out to every single business along that corridor for three years. She feels going back out after a three-year, on-going process is absurd since theyve been getting input for three years. She pointed out they will not make 100% of the people happy 100% of the time. She stated her belief everyone has worked very diligently to be very inclusive through this whole process. She feels the whole project can be delayed again.
Councilman Vayda stated the Hazardville streetscape process has been going on for some time. He noted he has no problem with listening to input from citizens, however, they are about to go out to bid.
Councilman Kaupin pointed out the subcommittee invited business owners to countless meetings, and business owners had the opportunity to attend and provide their input. He feels its time to move this project forward.
Councilman Mangini stated there are a couple of businesses in the Hazardville section that will be directly effected by this project. She feels its not asking too much to reach out to these businesses to learn about their concerns.
Councilman Tait agreed with Councilman Hall as concerns moving this project ahead.
Chairman of the Revitalization Committee, Bill Lee, joined the meeting at this point.
Mr. Lee noted theres a scheduled meeting of the Hazardville Revitalization Subcommittee tomorrow evening at the fire station at 7:00 p.m. He noted they will have maps available at that meeting, and they could phone abutters to invited them to that meeting.
MOTION #5450 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Tait to schedule a Special Meeting on Thursday, September 13th and invite abutting property owners.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5450 adopted 8-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: DALEO/PORCELLO SIDEWALK TREATMENT
Chairwoman Strom stated she would like to review this further before doing anything.
Councilman Fiore agreed with the compromise made about moving part of the sidewalk on Carpet Street, getting rid of islands, and just going with bituminous pavement. He added he would like to see some trees planted in the grassy area of Alden Avenue.
Councilman Kaupin agreed with moving the sidewalk at Carpet Street.
Councilman Tait noted he tried to navigate around a business on Enfield Street and they really do need turning room in these areas.
MOTION #5451 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Tait to suspend the rules to address Items i. and j. under Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5451 adopted 8-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: TANGUAY/MCGILL POST 80 LEASE
Mr. Shanley informed the Council there was a lease agreement starting in 1984 behind the American Legion property. He noted this lease was renegotiated in 1989 and was never executed. He pointed out it is supposed to be executed every five years. He pointed out they will need to execute a new lease and hopefully that lease will be available at the next meeting.
Councilman Falk stated his belief that area was used as a ball field years ago. He questioned the possibility of that becoming a ball field again.
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTION #5452 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini to waive the reading of the resolution. (Resolution re: 8-24 Referral To Abandon Intersection of Southview Street and Hazard Avenue)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5452 adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5453 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk.
(Resolution appended to these minutes)
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5453 adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5454 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Vayda.
WHEREAS, the charge of the School Building Committee requires the Town Council of the Town of Enfield review progress prior to award of the construction bids; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has been informed to its satisfaction and had its questions answered;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby authorizes the Town Manager to enter into agreements for bid package number 1, including Barnard, Whitney, Parkman and Hazardville Elementary, consistent with Town Charter and Town policy.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5454
adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5455 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Hall.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has reviewed bid package “number 2” including Stowe, Crandall and Hale as submitted by the School Building Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council, having heard an updated report from the Building Committee, finds the bid package in order;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby approves offering bid package number 2 to the market for bid.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5455
adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5456 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Kaupin.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has reviewed the bid package for the Senior Center Building submitted by the Senior Center Building Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council, having heard an updated report from the Senior Center Building Committee, finds the bid package in order;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby approves offering the Senior Center bid package to the market for bid.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5456
adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5457 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
WHEREAS, the Board of Education has approved the application for a grant up to $25,000 from the Graustein Memorial Fund; and
WHEREAS, the Board seeks to utilize these funds for projects such as hold Community Conversation Forums with specific focus groups, in-service training for Day Care Providers and surveying parents with small children to assess the needs of the community;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby supports the application to the Graustein Memorial Fund for a grant up to $25,000.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5457
adopted 8-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5458 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Hall.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO: Public Works Administration $1,750.00
Acct. #3100-339 Other Professional Serv.
FROM: Public Works Administration
Acct. #3100-120 Salaries Part Time $1,750.00
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the amount of $1,750.00 is available from Account #3100-120 as of August 21, 2001.
/s/ Gregory Simmons, Director of Finance
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5458
adopted 8-0-0.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
No one from the public wished to speak.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS
Councilman Mangini referred to a letter from DOT to a resident on Hazard Avenue as concerns a request for a left-hand turn signal. She noted this citizen is concerned about this intersection and the number of accidents in that area. Councilman Mangini stated she would like to know what the response from the Police Department was concerning this matter.
Mr. Shanley referred to the Route 190 Corridor study and significant discussions regarding that intersection.
Councilman Falk suggested Council members register early for the National League of Cities next conference. He pointed out earlier registrations save money. Chairwoman Strom requested Council members make it known if they plan to go.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #5459 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5459 adopted 8-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 10:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeannette Lamontagne
Secretary to the Council
Suzanne F. Olechnicki
Town Clerk
Clerk of the Council | |
|