|
|
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 16, 2001
A Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was held in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Monday, April 16, 2001. Chairwoman Strom called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
PRAYER The Prayer was given by Councilman Hall.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL Present were Councilmen Egan, Falk, Fiore, Giddings, Hall, Kaupin, Mangini, Strom and Vayda. Councilmen Dodd and McGuire were absent. Also present were Town Manager, Scott A. Shanley; Assistant Town Manager, Daniel T. Vindigni; Town Clerk, Suzanne F. Olechnicki; Town Attorney, Christopher W. Bromson; Director of Finance, Gregory Simmons; Director of Social Services, Dorothy Allen; Director of Public Works, John J. Kazmarski.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #5182 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini to accept the minutes of the March 24, 2001 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5182 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5183 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Vayda to accept the minutes of the April 2, 2001 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5183 adopted 8-0-1, with Councilman Hall abstaining.
MOTION #5184 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan to accept the minutes of the April 2, 2001 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5184 adopted 9-0-0.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Phillip Armentano, 12 Charnley Road
Spoke about a recent meeting at the Enfield Shade Tobacco Company concerning aerial pesticide spraying by helicopter for the upcoming summer season.
He noted that meeting was chaired by Councilman Egan, and it was attended by neighboring residents and other Enfield residents. He stated also attending this meeting were a representative from the State Department of Environmental Protection, Dr. Gary Ginsberg of the State of Connecticut Health Department, Dr. James Lamondia of the State of Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station, Dr. David Miller from the University of Connecticut, and William Blitz from the Health Department.
He noted the audience was permitted to ask questions, and most of those questions had to do with the spraying and the concerns neighbors have about the health risk as well as the noise level. He pointed out the spraying is scheduled to take place between 5:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., probably at least once per week, and the spraying will be done by a helicopter.He stated other questions had to do with the drift of the spray. He noted it was explained that the drift from the helicopters would not be as extensive as with fixed wing aerial spraying. He noted it was also claimed that ground spraying produced a more extensive drift than the helicopter pesticide operation.
Mr. Armentano noted he had questioned how many permits were issued last year by the State of Connecticut and the answer was only two one was to Enfield Shade Tobacco and a second one was issued to Raffia. He learned that Raffia only flew on one occasion. He stated this means that Enfield Shade Tobacco is the only one in Connecticut spraying on an extensive basis.
He stated one neighbor expressed concern about a child with severe asthma and was advised children and pets should be kept inside the house, and the doors and windows should be shut.
Mr. Armentano requested the Council consider enacting an ordinance that prohibits aerial spraying of pesticides in the Town of Enfield. He stated his belief this is a community issue and an ordinance is necessary to protect the residents and children of Enfield.
Wade Berchel, 11 Charnley Road
Stated he was a military helicopter pilot. He noted more research needs to be done, i.e., what type of helicopter will be used and what will the wind conditions need to be to spray safely. He noted if this aerial spraying is to take place, the Town should be sure its going to be done safely. He pointed out that there are young children on that road. He feels this should be postponed until theres more education on this issue.
Margaret Jedziniak, 232 Abbe Road
Voiced her strong opposition to the proposed budget, which she feels is a burden, particularly to people on fixed incomes. She stated her hope this budget will be cut a great deal before taxes are set.
Ms. Jedziniak stated shes very skeptical about the resolution being proposed to support the Enfield Board of Education in its pursuit of the “East of the River Head Start Consortium”. She stated her belief the Council should not go along with this unless the Council sees it in writing that the CRT and Human Resources will have to turn the running of the program over to the Enfield Board of Education without any stipulations and that all money should be checked by the Towns Finance Director. She stated she does not want Enfield taxpayers caught in the middle of this and have to foot the bill for a social service program that has been taken over by the Board and foisted onto the taxpayer as part of their local tax obligation.
Vincent Sferrazza, 3 Woodbridge Drive
Noted many condo residents have lived in Enfield all their lives and chose to remain in Enfield in their retirement years. He pointed out condo fees have risen over the years, as well as property taxes, and some condo owners cannot afford to live in their condos any longer. He stated his hope the Town will consider rubbish pick-up for condominiums.
Patrick Colca, Fairview Avenue
Stated Enfield received a poor ranking in Connecticut Magazine. He stated his belief the high crime rate in Enfield keeps the police from having the time to address traffic violations in Enfield, i.e., speeding. He noted its hazardous for pedestrians to walk the streets of town due to speeding vehicles.
John Slater, 4H The Hamlet
Stated his hope the Town will pick up condo trash. He stated his belief this will not be a big expense to the Town. He noted he pays taxes in Enfield and feels condo owners are discriminated against regarding this trash issue.
Referring to tobacco aerial spraying, Mr. Slater noted he used to live near a field and his car was covered with pesticide spray on one occasion.
Rick Breton, 10 Charnley Road
Agreed with previous comments about aerial spraying. He noted he does not want his three small children to have any bad effects from aerial spraying. He requested the Council get more information about this issue.
Cheryl Butenas, Maple Heights
Pointed out the Council is not seeing a lot of people from the different condo associations because they chose Randy Stevens and Nancy Bent to represent them.
As concerns pesticide spraying over tobacco fields, Ms. Butenas stated last year the plane doing the spraying flew very low over her home, and she was very concerned about this issue. She voiced her support in that the Council research this further.
Bernard DePersis, 79 The Laurels
Stated when marketing condo developments, developers subsidize the operating expenses of the association. He noted this is done to keep the maintenance fees down and to make the marketability of the units more attractive. He stated when a majority of the units are sold, the developer transfers the title over to the association. He noted at that point, the association gets the brunt of it since the developer is no longer subsidizing the operating expenses.
Mr. DePersis stated condo owners are paying more than their fair share of taxes in town, but are not getting much in the way of service.
He urged the Council to think positively when theyre being requested to provide this one service to condo owners.
Raymond Gregson, 30 Conlin Drive
Referring to pesticide spraying, Mr. Gregson stated his belief the Council has a responsibility to consider the long term health effects of this spraying on the citizens of Enfield.
Robert Dumas, D10 Bradley Circle (Georgetown Condominiums)
Stated he has lived in Enfield for 40 years and his children attended the Enfield school system. He noted his condo association just received their budget today, and they spent in excess of $50,000 in snowplowing. He noted that is a good amount that the Town of Enfield didnt have to pay. He stated they take care of their own plowing, salting and sanding; they supply their own streetlights; they maintain their own sidewalks, etc. He stated his belief condo owners should be given some consideration for trash pick-up. He noted when he purchased his condo, he did not know he had to pay for trash pick up.
Robert Tkacz, 1300 Enfield Street
Stated Mattie Porcello, who is ill, wished Mr. Tkacz to speak on his behalf. He noted Mr. Porcello supports the Blight Ordinance.
Referring to the financials regarding condo trash pick up, he noted payroll and benefits appear in line, however, he believes it may become necessary to create an Operator III status. He went on to note theres no annual operating savings. He explained the recycling rebate summary of fiscal year June 30, 1999 was only $12,038.90. He stated his impression there will be an operating loss of $4,361. He noted the capital outlay of $210,000 for a truck seems to be in line. He stated his belief if they duplicate the present service at the condo complexes, it comes out to $140,975. He noted if they go to all tipper barrels, it would be $67,000, however, that cant be done. He stated theres a modified version that would cost about $112,000 if they converted to tipper barrels at five condo complexes.
Mr. Tkacz stated there would be an outlay of $70,000 if the Town didnt use an outside contractor. He noted the net capital outlay would be $421,000, and the annual capitalization cost is going to $32,000.
He stated at this time it costs $252 per residence to pick up trash, and if they add the condominiums, it will cost about $220 per household.
Mary Ann Turner, 7 Meadow Road
As concerns assessments on condominiums, Ms. Turner noted its 70% of the market value. She noted this has to do with when the purchase was made, what the price was, and what the market will bear. He stated condominiums have declarations, and they are all different.
William Mucci, 15 Northfield Road
Requested an explanation about the delinquent tax bill he recently received.
Mr. Shanley stated this is still being researched, but it appears as though an entire mail crate at the post office did not get delivered in January. He noted this amounts to 500 to 700 bills. He noted theyre exploring ways to identify those people that did not receive the January mailing. He stated they will work on this over the next week to see if they can find a way to address the interest on these bills.
Raymond Gregson, 30 Conlin Drive
He questioned how people can be expected to pay a delinquent tax when they never received the original notification.
Lisa Audette, 53 Enfield Commons
Voiced her agreement with previous condo owners who spoke.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Councilman Egan stated there was a public meeting last week that she was not in attendance at, and she was accused of not informing the Council of the meeting that was held at Enfield Shade Tobacco. She referred to Page 7 of the April 2, 2001 meeting minutes in which she stated the time, the place, and who would be at the Enfield Shade Tobacco meeting. She noted she had also encouraged anyone on the Council to attend.
She stated she was not present at the Enfield Shade Tobacco meeting representing the Council, but rather because she has worked with residents on this issue for three years. She pointed out she worked with the Misty Meadow neighbors, along with Councilman Kaupin, Senator Kissell, State Representative Jarmoc and more recently Representative Peggy Sayers. She noted what came out of the neighborhood meetings three years ago was the buffer change so that theres a 300 foot buffer between the end of the property and where the spraying can take place.
Councilman Egan stated presently theres legislation at the Capitol by Senator LeBeau concerning the banning of aerial spraying, except in the case of emergencies. She noted theres also a best management practice of legislation that Representative Jarmoc has proposed and that is working its way through Committee as well.
Councilman Egan stated the Town Council has no powers over farming operations, but rather this is something that is done at the state level. She pointed out the state senators and representatives have also been working on this.
She stated in order for there to be helicopters flying, people who live adjacent to those properties have to sign a waiver allowing that.
Councilman Egan pointed out this is the first time theres been communication between Enfield Shade Tobacco and the neighbors, and that needs to continue.
Councilman Kaupin stated a resident asked if the Town will be publishing the assessment list at some point in time. He noted some thought should be given as to how theyll publish the assessments.
Councilman Kaupin noted the question was raised as to whether aerial spraying should be banned in the Town of Enfield. He noted the answer a few years ago was “no” and that this is regulated by the State. He stated last year the residents had no idea what was happening in their neighborhood. He urged people to lobby their state legislators.
Councilman Mangini requested the Town Attorney research what the Town can do about aerial spraying.
Councilman Mangini referred to information in the Councils packets regarding a uniform mandate to workers compensation. She requested an update on this. Mr. Shanley noted this is a piece of state legislation. He noted they can find out if this has been successful at the state level.
Councilman Mangini reminded the Council about the MS Walk this Sunday.
Councilman Mangini stated a young girl has cystic fibrosis, and there will be a fundraiser for her on May 19th. She stated her hope some people will get involved by supporting the walk or by giving donations.
Councilman Hall stated her understanding the noise ordinance is still at the state level and theres an agricultural exemption in that ordinance. She requested copies of what the state guidelines are regarding this. She pointed out helicopter spraying will be extremely noisy at 5:30 a.m. She questioned if a helicopter is considered farm equipment.
Councilman Hall stated the Womens Club of Enfield is doing a fund raiser on May 19th, and this is a tour of homes. She noted this will run from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. with a luncheon from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Felician Adult Day Care on Enfield Street.
Councilman Vayda thanked Councilmen Kaupin and Egan for their input on the aerial spraying. He added he is also interested in learning about the noise ordinance item raised by Councilman Hall. He went on to question what other information can they provide to the residents of Charnley Road and other areas effected by aerial spraying as concerns their rights and who to contact at the state level to determine what the limitations and parameters would be relative to this. He added if the limitations are violated, the people should know their rights and what can be done from their perspective. He questioned if the farmer is required to do any bonding to protect the neighborhoods.
Councilman Falk stated Nathan Hale School did an excellent job with “Fiddler on the Roof” which was held at Fermi High School.
Councilman Falk stated a couple weeks ago, he and Councilman Mangini attended the annual Food Shelf recognition dinner. He added the Food Shelf was also presented with the $500 the Council earned on tips at the Ground Round. He noted the Food Shelf also appreciated the Town allowing them to remain in the Higgins building.
Councilman Falk requested an update on the Wallop School Park.
Councilman Fiore responded to comments made by Mr. Colca concerning speeding in Enfield and pointed out about six months ago the Town Council passed a traffic calming policy and there are set procedures that any resident can go through if theyre concerned about traffic in their neighborhoods.
Councilman Fiore congratulated Ray Warren, the Director of Economic Development, for the award he will be receiving from the President of Asnuntuck College. He noted this will be the Board of Trustees Merit Award.
Councilman Fiore requested that the recreation residential policy and potential adjustment to some of the fees be included on the next agenda so that they might come to a resolution on this before they start detailing the budget. Chairwoman Strom suggested this be included as a discussion item on the upcoming agenda.
Councilman Giddings noted some merchants in Thompsonville requested trash receptacles for the front of their businesses. He noted they offered to maintain those barrels. Mr. Shanley noted its planned to do that, and the Council will see this item in the budget.
Councilman Mangini stated her recollection that the Enfield Revitalization had the trash receptacles as an initiative.
Councilman Hall referred to zoning for agricultural land. She noted Enfield Shade Tobacco leases some of the property they farm on. She questioned if theres a list of specific crops that can be planted in these fields. Mr. Shanley noted he will look into this.
Councilman Hall pointed out theres a lot of litter in the area of Big Y.
MOTION #5185 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to transfer Items 12b and 12L from Items for Discussion to Old Business, under Item 10B.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5185 adopted 9-0-0.
Chairwoman Strom pointed out the Town Council and legislators have worked hard to get something done regarding aerial spraying. She noted they must lobby every agency as best they can regarding this issue so insure the health and safety of all Enfield residents.
As concerns barrels for Thompsonville, Chairwoman Strom stated her recollection they were going to put something out temporarily. Mr. Shanley raised the question of liability if a business employee is injured while emptying this receptacle. He added the budget proposal is to do a much more aggressive job on beautification and collection in town. He stated theyre proposing additional personnel and equipment in order to do that.
Chairwoman Strom questioned the difference with a business that has their own barrel on the Towns right-of-way vs the Town supplying the barrel.
Chairwoman Strom stated she saw several Councilmembers at the Womens Club Art Festival last weekend. She noted they gave out five scholarships and stated her belief theres incredible talent in this town.
Chairwoman Strom commended the Town Hall staff for their handling of the delinquent bills.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Shanley stated agriculture is very heavily protected by the State of Connecticut.
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Attorney Bromson stated he will look into questions relating to aerial spraying.
REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL
Councilman Kaupin stated the Town Green Advisory Committee met last week, and this project should be completed by Memorial Day. He noted the fountain is to be delivered the second week of May. He noted the Committee would like to sunset itself after this project.
Councilman Kaupin stated the School Projects Building Committee meeting that was scheduled for this Thursday has been postponed to May 3rd. He noted Head Start and Enfield Street School are on P&Zs next agenda.
Councilman Kaupin referred to the Condo Subcommittee and noted they do have some answers to the questions that were raised during Council discussion last meeting, and theyll bring it up later on the agenda.
Councilman Mangini referred to the National League of Cities and noted she received the update on the FAIR Committee. She explained “FAIR” stands for Finance Administration Intergovernmental Relations. She noted the priority for this committee is the future of municipal finance, municipal bonds, and federal tax policy.
Councilman Mangini stated the Indoor Recreation Committee is welcoming any and all ideas or plans that residents or educators might have with regards to incorporating indoor recreation for the town.
Councilman Mangini stated the Enfield Revitalization Committee would like the Council to keep their charge tabled until after the budget. She noted they would also like to make a presentation.
Councilman Giddings stated Bill Lee, the Chairman of the Enfield Revitalization Committee would like to set up a workshop with the Council to discuss “Main Street USA”.
Councilman Mangini stated she attended the Commission on Aging meeting last Wednesday, and at the end of the month there will be a National Nursing Home Week. She noted a lot of activities are being planned.
Councilman Kaupin stated the School Building Committee will be coming before the Council the first meeting in May for their quarterly report. He noted by the end of May the time tables call for Council approval of the projects so they can go out to bid on the individual projects.
Councilman Fiore stated the Senior Center Building Committee should be coming before the Council toward the end of May or June in order to present their quarterly report.
Councilman Falk questioned the cost to replace Carlo Bonavita as concerns the building of the Senior Center. Councilman Fiore stated right now the Senior Center Building Committee is exploring a lot of different options, i.e., a general contractor with a clerk of the works or a construction manager. He stated they are still exploring this area.
Mr. Shanley stated his belief there was a vote to go with the general contractor at the meeting. Councilman Fiore agreed and noted at this time theyll probably also be looking for a Clerk of the Works.
Councilman Hall questioned when theyre closing on that property. Mr. Shanley responded the end of June.
MOTION #5186 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to add an item to the agenda under Items for Discussion “A Discussion re: A Resolution Scheduling a Public Hearing on a CDBG Grant”.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5186 adopted 9-0-0.
OLD BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL
MOTION #5187 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to remove Item #14 from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5187 adopted 9-0-0.
NOMINATION #5188 by Councilman Hall to appoint Steve Twitchell (D) to the School Projects Building Committee as an alternate.
MOTION #5189 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to close nominations.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5189 adopted 9-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared Steve Twitchell appointed to the School Projects Building Committee by a 9-0-0 vote.
All other Town Council appointments remained tabled.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN MANAGER)
All Town Manager appointments remained tabled.
DISCUSSION RE: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING BOE IN PURSUIT OF AN EAST OF THE RIVER HEADSTART CONSORTIUM
Present for this discussion were Director of Head Start, Barbara Wachala; Board of Education Member, Nicholas Sinsigalli; Chairman of the Policy Committee for Head Start, Laura Prouty.
Mr. Sinsigalli explained theyre trying to form a new consortium with towns on the east side of the river to develop a grantee who would administer the financial regulations of the grant. He stated with the current situation theyre dealing with some governance and financial problems.
Councilman Hall questioned what the problems are that lead up to this point, and why is this procedure being recommended.
Mr. Sinsigalli explained one of the requirements of the grant is that the grantee has to have what is called a policy council. He noted this policy council is responsible for passing all of the required resolutions to meet whatever the grant applications are at the time. He stated this last year, their funding for the grant was supposed to be passed in September, and through a lot of governance issues at CRT and Head Start, it wasnt passed until January. He noted at that meeting it passed with only one vote, so they almost lost that window, and as a result of that, all funding has been delayed from that point.
Mr. Shanley stated the grantee in this case is the Community Renewal Team (CRT). He explained Head Start is funded only through some form of consortium, and thats the consortium that Enfield has been a part of. He noted what Mr. Sinsigalli is referring to as the grantee is that CRT, as the grantee, has been performing in a way thats displeasing to Enfield, Manchester, and East Hartford.
Councilman Kaupin stated his understanding Enfield Head Start is a very successful program and is a model used by other communities, and theres a very high participation rate in this program. He questioned if in making the change from CRT to this new grouping, would there be any risk to being able to continue on with the Head Start program at the level they have today, or will this new group be able to secure the funding thats needed, but also possibly be able to target grants to either increase the funding or continue on par.
Mr. Sinsigalli stated his belief that in the end they should have their position substantially improved.
Ms. Wachala stated CRT would either have to release them, or if they are de-funded, the grant would then have to be reapplied for. She noted based on the history of Enfield Head Start, which has rated as a program of excellence, she believes theyre recognized in Boston as doing a good, high-quality job. She stated they would like to get out from under CRT and form their own consortium. She pointed out not only is there grant money available, but up to 15% of the grant is for administrative funds, and that could come back to each of the towns, therefore, there would be more money available. She noted being under CRT has been an impediment. She stated their money has been late, and theres a very poor management system.
Councilman Kaupin stated his impression the success of Enfield Head Start is not necessarily tied to the involvement of CRT. Ms. Wachala responded absolutely not. She stated because of their relationship with the Board of Education and Town of Enfield, they have a very good program. She pointed out Manchester and East Hartford are also under Boards of Education. She noted the three programs and possibly Vernon would form a new consortium which would continue to be model programs.
Mr. Sinsigalli stated the only question is who will be the grantee.
Councilman Fiore questioned if theyre continuing to pursue Vernon to see if they would like to belong to this new consortium. Ms. Wachala responded yes.
Councilman Fiore questioned what will happen if these towns proceed with this new consortium and CRT does not release them. Ms. Wachala stated if CRT does not release
them, they would have to go to Boston to ACF and request a de-funding of CRT.
Councilman Fiore questioned what will the overhead be to the towns of Enfield, Manchester, East Hartford, and possibly Vernon. He questioned if there will be a new layer of bureaucracy that the Town will have to support. Ms. Wachala responded no. She noted they could take the administrative costs and hire one person to manage those grants, and it could flow through one of the three towns. Councilman Fiore questioned if it could be shared by the three towns, and Ms. Wachala responded yes.
Councilman Giddings stated if the change were to take place and there was a transition period, would there be any risk of not having funding during the transition period. Ms. Wachala stated there have already been periods of time where theyve gone four to six months without receiving their funds, and the Board of Education has supported Head Start during those periods. She noted presently they are somewhat in that situation, whereby theyve received some money, but not all of it. Mr. Sinsigalli stated theyve had to apply pressure to the state twice to receive their funding in the past.
Councilman Vayda questioned if this new consortium would be an incorporated or chartered organization. Ms. Wachala stated possibly if it were running under one of the Boards of Education, or they could establish a new non-profit organization.
Councilman Vayda stated when this organization is established, will their be some review process that each town would go through to determine whether or not the charter is acceptable to each community. Ms. Wachala responded yes, and that would be reviewed by ACF, the federal government, and new bylaws would have to be written.
MOTION #5190 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini to suspend the rules to address this item under Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5190 adopted 9-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: WRESTLING PROGRAM
Present from the wrestling program were Roger Moran and Michael Stesel.
Councilman Mangini stated the Indoor Recreation Committee is actively looking for ways to make improvements in Enfield. She noted one of the programs that has been identified is indoor wrestling. She noted this program had to move to Suffield due to other commitments by the school department. She stated they are looking for ways to accommodate the needs of this program so that it can return to Enfield.
Councilman Mangini questioned the wrestling representatives as to what their needs would be in order to be able to return to Enfield, i.e., space and equipment needs.
Mr. Moran stated during the season the wrestling mats have to be rolled and left against the wall where theyre easily accessible. He explained they have to be rolled back out and washed before use. He noted these mats are very large (approximately 40 square) and weigh about 500 to 660 pounds each. He stated they had this arrangement at JFK Middle School for nine years until they built a rock-climbing wall in the gymnasium that the wrestling program was using. He noted they did not want the wrestling program to use that gymnasium any longer because of liability.
Councilman Falk questioned how they would store these mats in the off season, and Mr. Moran stated they could be stored in a closet thats about 15 to 16 feet long by 10 feet wide. He noted it takes about six adults to move a mat.
Councilman Mangini questioned what type of accommodations do the current elementary schools have that might be useable. Mr. Moran stated the easiest alternative for everyone would be for the wrestling program to use one of the two high schools. He noted each school already has two wrestling mats, and theyre rolled out everyday. He pointed out both coaches at the high schools are very pleased that there is a youth wrestling program. He noted this is direct feeder program for the high schools, and all of their participants are able to join the high school wrestling programs and they have experience. He noted Coach Parker suggested this wrestling program follow his own wrestling program which ends at 6:00 p.m.
Mr. Stesel stated the youth and high school wrestling teams blend together. He noted theyre in need of no more than what they had before they left JFK. He pointed out their enrollment dropped from 90 to 46. He stated his belief that enrollment would climb back up if they were to return to Enfield.
Mr. Moran pointed out 90% of their participants are Enfield residents. He pointed out the name of this program is Enfield Youth Wrestling.
Councilman Falk questioned if they prefer to come back to Enfield, and they expressed their desire to return to Enfield so that they can increase their enrollment.
Councilman Hall expressed her disappointment in having to lose this program. She stated her belief this is a territorial issue, and she feels it could be accommodated by the Board of Education if they so chose to accommodate it. She stated at this point, they need to start asking some very pointed questions and getting some definite responses. She stated her hope they can get some cooperation this year.
Councilman Falk stated his belief they should probably have a meeting with the Board of Education regarding this issue.
Mr. Moran suggested perhaps there can be a slight adjustment in one of the other sports to accommodate this activity.
Councilman Kaupin agreed with Councilman Hall. He spoke about the importance of feeder programs. He stated his belief the Board of Education members on the Indoor Recreation Committee should be lobbying the Board of Education to gain support for this wrestling program.
Councilman Mangini stated Mr. Vindigni is going to try to get CCM to help the Committee put together a time chart filled with recreational programs, including the schools theyre being held at, the times theyre being held, etc. She noted they need to learn how to use their space.
Councilman Kaupin stated his belief they need to keep pushing forward on this and find a short term solution. He noted they sold the referendum on public use of the gymnasiums. He acknowledged this is not a building committee responsibility, but rather its a Board of Education and Town Council responsibility to plan for the future, and find space today for this feeder program.
Councilman Falk agreed that while they dont have control over the schools, the Board of Education has the ultimate say. He stated his belief the Council has to come to some sort of consensus in that this is an important issue and work with the Board to resolve some of the issues, i.e., timing and space.
Councilman Vayda stated hes not comfortable with re-working any plans for new additions on the schools. He stated his belief they should look at how they will allocate the space they currently have or will have on line in the future.
Councilman Hall stated the new gyms are bigger than what they have now, therefore, she does not see a need for any revisions to any building committee plans. She stated her belief it seems like a viable option to use Enfield High Schools wrestling area right after theyve used it. She suggested Roger Jones could take this idea to the Board of Education from the Building Committee. She noted she wants specific answers.
Councilman Mangini requested Mr. Vindigni report back on CCM. Mr. Vindigni stated CCM is for feedback on a future needs survey. He noted the Committee discussed working on a grid sheet for the different schools.
Councilman Fiore agreed with Councilman Halls idea to come up with a list of requirements that the wrestling coaches feel they need for their program. He noted the new gymnasium expansions will bring a lot of new space on line for the town. He stated his belief part of the reason this new subcommittee was formed was to figure out how they might use that new space.
Chairwoman Strom stated her belief the Town wants to support the wrestling program and the concept of feeder programs is very important. She stated her impression one of the first functions of the Indoor Recreation Committee was to look at what they have now, the new space to become available and work very closely with the Board of Education to come up with a way that space will be used and allocated. She added one of the reasons they were successful with the referendum was that these new gyms would be available to the public. She stated with each of the schools to have their own gyms, she finds it hard to believe they wont be able to find one gym where the mats could be rolled up and stored. She feels its a matter of one of the principals saying its available on a particular night. She stated her belief the key is to look at how the scheduling is to be done.
Mr. Moran agreed its a matter of scheduling.
Councilman Giddings stated his belief they should support this program. He questioned the season for this program. Mr. Moran stated the youth program runs around the same time as the high school, which starts the first of December. He noted the youth program continues a little longer and their last tournament is the first week in April.
Councilman Falk agreed scheduling is an issue, however, they have to have a place to store the mats. He noted the new gyms are being filled up by a basketball court, therefore, if theyre to store the mats in one gym, that particular basketball court would have to be just a little smaller. He stated the Building Committee would need to be aware of that, and theyd need consent from the Council and the Board in order to make one school different than the others.
Councilman Kaupin stated his recollection of the gymnasiums is that there would be sufficient storage space on the sides of the court, and they would still have an out-of-bounds for basketball. He stated he does not agree that this is a Building Committee issue right now. He pointed out the projects are going out to bid the end of May.
Councilman Mangini stated her belief the issue has to do with scheduling.
Mr. Moran stated they need two nights per week, two hours per night, 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
MOTION #5190A by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Giddings to remove Item c-1 from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5190A adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5191 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Giddings.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has embarked on a comprehensive review addressing blight issues including changes to the Waste Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, following considerable deliberation and a Public Hearing, the Town Council has decided to amend the current proposed Solid Waste Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby adopts the amended Solid Waste Ordinance.
AMENDMENT #1 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to amend Section 8B-3. (c) as follows:
(c) Containers for multi-family dwellings. The standard container for multi-family dwelling residential refuse shall be a Tipper Barrel, provided by the property owner, as specified by the Department of Public Works.
Also, to add (g), (h), and (i) under Section 8B-7 as follows:
(g) This ordinance is adopted pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. 7-148(c)(7)(H)(xv) and is considered a Blight Ordinance
(h) Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. 7-148aa, any unpaid fine imposed pursuant to this ordinance shall constitute a lien upon the real property against which the fine was imposed from the date of such fine.
(i) This ordinance will be effective June 1, 2001.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1 adopted 9-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5191 adopted 9-0-0, as amended.
MOTION #5192 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Fiore to remove Item c. 2) from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5192 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5193 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Kaupin.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has embarked on a comprehensive review addressing issues of “blight” and deterioration in the Town; and
WHEREAS, following considerable deliberation and a Public Hearing, the Town Council has decided to amend the current Abandoned Vehicle and Unsightly Material Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby adopts an amended Abandoned Vehicle and Unsightly Material Ordinance as attached hereto.
AMENDMENT #1 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to add to the end of the last paragraph “…attached hereto dated 4/12/01.”
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1 adopted 9-0-0.
Councilman Mangini expressed her appreciation to staff for their work on this.
Councilman Fiore referred to Section 5B-11 (a), and questioned who makes determinations on motor vehicles. Mr. Shanley stated this language was recommended by the Town Attorneys office. He noted it was explained to him this is designed to insure that it closes a potential loophole that is not covered by “inoperable” or by “unregistered”.
Chairwoman Strom also questioned who makes the determination regarding motor vehicles. Attorney Bromson stated ultimately someone is making a good faith determination with any ordinance. As concerns the need for this language to be included, he noted he prefers to defer to Attorney Stavropoulos who has worked on this.
Referring to Section 5B-13 (a), Councilman Fiore questioned what would prevent someone who owned multiple properties from shuttling around these abandoned vehicles so they dont exceed the 30 days. Attorney Bromson stated they cant address every scenario, and under the law theres going to have to be a definite violation at a particular site for the statutory period before the Town can move on them. He noted if someone wished to shuffle around cars, it wouldnt be a violation. He added he doubts people who have violations also own multiple properties or would want to go through the trouble of shuffling cars around.
It was agreed to omit Section 5B-16 (b).
Councilman Kaupin voiced his support of the ordinance and the changes. He added he likes the further definition of “unsightly” under 5B-11 (d) where there was a concern over allowing multiple piles of material. He noted he wants the ordinance enforceable, and he likes this ordinance because it was a collaborative effort of the people who actually have to do the enforcing.
Councilman Falk noted at an earlier meeting there were concerns by the fire departments about the cars that they use for practice, and supposedly there were some meetings between the Town and fire chiefs. He questioned what was resolved at those meetings.Mr. Shanley stated he was not part of those meetings, however, he was assured the discussions did take place and the fire chiefs were more comfortable with this ordinance.
Councilman Falk stated the other issue had to do with concerns raised by Mr. Bosco, and he noted that was addressed by state statute. Mr. Shanley stated section ( c ) on Page 3 was added to insure that at no time will the Town be penalizing a wrecker service thats attempting to comply with the state law in the abandoning or disposition of a car. He noted the wrecker service needs to let the police department know theyve filed the proper paperwork.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5193 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5194 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to remove Item d. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5194 adopted 9-0-0.
LAND USE BOARD STATUS REPORT
Chairwoman Strom stated this was and still is a very good initiative that the Town Council should pursue. She noted the problem has been that theyve been so busy doing everything else, its been impossible to get this subcommittee together to pursue it. She stated at this time she is looking to take this item off the agenda. She noted she hopes to revisit it in the near future.
MOTION #5195 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Vayda to remove this item from the agenda.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5195 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5196 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to remove Item e. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5196 adopted 9-0-0.
CONTINUED DISCUSSION RE: USE OF NORTH SCHOOL
Councilman Giddings stated the Save Our Strand Group and the Strand Performing Arts Center will have to move out of their current building by May 12th. He noted one idea is to use the North School, and they believe this building will be ideal for their needs. He proposed the Town Council meet with the Strand Board of Directors to discuss details regarding this group possibly becoming a tenant at the North School.
Councilman Mangini questioned whether the North School will be a safe structure for this group to occupy. Councilman Giddings stated his belief its a safe structure. He noted the roof doesnt leak and theres heat.
Councilman Fiore stated he wants to know about the Towns liability and the safety of that building. He noted he would like Town staffs insight into that building.
Councilman Falk stated if they were to do this, they would need some sort of lease agreement.
Chairwoman Strom suggested Town staff arrange for someone from the Strand Board of Directors to look at this building. She added they should also look at what the Towns liability exposure might be. She noted they should also learn if this building has to have handicap access and whether its fire code compliant.
Councilman Hall stated her recollection they had gathered some costs for the North School when the Enfield Food Shelf looked at this building for their use. Mr. Shanley pointed out those cost estimates were very specific in relationship to the needs of the Enfield Food Shelf.
MOTION #5197 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Hall to re-table this item.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5197 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5198 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to remove Item f. 1 and f. 2 from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5198 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5199 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has embarked on a comprehensive review addressing Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency issues; and
WHEREAS, following considerable deliberation and a Public Hearing, the Town Council has decided to replace the current Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency Ordinance;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby adopts the new Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency Ordinance.
AMENDMENT #1 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Giddings to add the following wording at the end of the final paragraph as follows:
“NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby adopts the new Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Agency Ordinance as revised on 3/15/01.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1 adopted 9-0-0.
AMENDMENT #2 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Hall to revise this so that the initial appointment shall be three members for a term of two years, two for a term of three, and two for a term of four.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #2 adopted 9-0-0.
Upon a ROLL CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5199 adopted 8-1-0, as amended, with Councilman Mangini voting against the resolution.
RESOLUTION #5200 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has embarked on a comprehensive review addressing Conservation Commission issues;
WHEREAS, following considerable deliberation and a public hearing, the Town Council has decided to replace the current Conservation Commission ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby adopts a new Conservation Commission ordinance.
AMENDMENT #1 by Councilman Vayda, seconded by Councilman Mangini to add the following wording at the end of the final paragraph as follows:
“NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby adopts a new Conservation Commission ordinance as revised on 3/15/01.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1 adopted 9-0-0.
AMENDMENT #2 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Hall to revise this so that the initial appointment shall consist of seven members and three alternate members with terms three members for a term of two years, two for a term of three, and two for a term of four.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #2 adopted 9-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5200 adopted 8-1-0, as amended, with Councilman Mangini voting against the resolution.
Item g. remained tabled.
MOTION #5201 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Giddings to remove Item h. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5201 adopted 9-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: CHARGE FOR ENFIELD REVITALIZATION AND RELATED COMMITTEES
Councilman Fiore stated they had a lot of applicants come in for reappointment and new people interested in being appointed. He pointed out many of those people did mention on their applications their interest in numerous boards, and most indicated their first choice was the Revitalization Committee. He noted many of those applications started coming in around Thanksgiving. He stated they should contact these people.
Councilman Kaupin stated he would encourage these people to attend Revitalization Committee meetings so that they can see if theyre interested. He noted many of those applicants are already current members.
MOTION #5202 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Falk to re-table this item.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5202 adopted 9-0-0.
Items i. and j. remained tabled.
NEW BUSINESS
DISCUSSION RE: CONDOMINIUM SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT
Councilman Kaupin stated there were some specific questions raised at the last Council meeting. He noted they received a verbal response to those questions. He stated one question was about the Somers Sanitation contract and when that expires. He pointed out that contract is currently on an annual basis, expiring at the end of December, 2001. He noted another question had to do with the Towns private contractor and whether the Town gets reimbursed from the four private schools where theres pick-up. He stated the Town does not get reimbursed for those pick-ups, and this has been in place since the mid-1970s. He noted the state came down with an equalization process between public and private schools whereby the Town had to provide some services to the private schools, i.e., busing and nurse care. He noted this is not a requirement, but the dollar amount is tossed into the formula as reported back to the state. He stated they dont know the reason why the town provides this service.
Councilman Kaupin stated another question was how will a replacement vehicle be obtained if the front end loader is down for maintenance or repairs and what would be the anticipated cost for the replacement vehicle. He noted it was conveyed that if the front end loader is down for a period of a few days, the packer vehicle would be able to pick up and dispose of the trash, however, if it became a long-term issue, the Town would have to go out and rent a vehicle for the replacement.
Councilman Kaupin stated they still have issues outstanding that the Town Attorney is researching. Attorney Bromson stated Planning and Zoning does not do a formal approval for the trash plan.
Councilman Kaupin stated they also have a few more questions for Public Works on the detailed listing of dumpsters. He stated one question is whether the $125,000 with Somers Sanitation is an accurate amount, is there an annual increase, are fees covered in it, i.e., a fuel surcharge. He noted they also need a breakdown on the $80,000 to purchase dumpsters and containers. He stated theres also one question to Finance on the capitalization of the equipment. He stated his hope theyll have answers to these questions for the next Council meeting.
Councilman Hall questioned if the Town Council decides to provide this service, does that mean nothing has to go before P&Z. Attorney Bromson stated he did not believe so.
Councilman Hall questioned whether her inquiry regarding assessment will be addressed. Attorney Bromson stated that is a much more complex question. He went on to note that question was if this service is extended to condominiums, how will that effect their assessments. He noted theyre talking to the Finance Department regarding this and they will have to do research to learn what the precedent is.
MOTION #5203 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to re-table this item.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5203 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5204 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan.
WHEREAS, Environmental Risk Limited (ERL), a Connecticut based groundwater consulting firm, has undertaken numerous projects with the Town of Enfield; and
WHEREAS, Environmental Risk Limited is an independent firm not associated with previous work at the landfill site; and
WHEREAS, the Hazardville Water Company, whose wells are adjacent to the site, is comfortable with the firm and concurs with their utilization;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield, finds it in the best interest of the Town to waive the bid process to allow Environmental
Risk Limited (ERL) to provide the services outlined in the three phase groundwater evaluation proposal for the closed Town Farm Landfill at a cost not to exceed $43,500.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5204 adopted 9-0-0.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
The appointment to the Loan Review Committee will appear under New Business on the next regular meeting agenda.
MOTION #5205 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to suspend the rules to address Items d., e., f., g., h., i., j., k., and n. to Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5205 adopted 9-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: GREEN MANOR SIDEWALKS
Mr. Shanley stated they had another neighborhood meeting in the Green Manor area, and there was a prolonged and detailed discussion regarding the sidewalk plan. He noted the results appear to be that they should have sidewalks on both sides of the two major streets Green Manor and Sheridan Roads. He stated as discussed previously, one sidewalk is appropriate on the other roads.
Mr. Kazmarski showed and explained an illustration of the sidewalk plan for Green Manorville.
It was the consensus of the Council to go with the proposal as presented by Mr. Kazmarski.
DISCUSSION RE: EMS STUDY: TIME FRAME FOR DISCUSSION
It was agreed to have a workshop on this item.
Mr. Shanley stated theres a $400,000 contingency budget. He noted if the Council decides to move in the direction of a coordinator, the contingency would be a source of beginning the funding for that. Councilman Vayda suggested discussing this at the next meeting.
MISCELLANEOUS
RESOLUTION #5206 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Egan.
WHEREAS, the Council has discussed the issues of lack of confidence in the Community Renewal Team (CRT) as a pass through agency for Head Start federal and state funding; and
WHEREAS, the School Board has made a compelling case for the commonalties that exist for the Town of Enfield, Manchester and East Hartford which seek to form a consortium together rather than continue with CRT; among these commonalties is that all programs fall under the umbrella of a Board of Education; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has read and concurs with a joint letter from Manchester, Enfield, and East Hartford to CRT;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council supports the Enfield Board of Education in its efforts to create a new consortium for Head Start funding and urges support from our Congressional Delegation.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5206 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5207 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
RESOLVED, that the Town of Enfield has submitted an application to the Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG) seeking funding consideration for the Town Farm Road/Post Office Road Reconstruction Project; and
WHEREAS, the Town has decided to proceed with the design and construction of the project as submitted to CRCOG and the Connecticut Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the Towns project has received a favorable recommendation of obtaining a funding commitment in the amount of $2,000,000 under the STP-Urban Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town will be required to fund the design of the project, contribute to the funding of certain other aspects in accordance with established Federal and State criteria, and accept the responsibility for providing any additional construction related funds that may be required for the completion of the project above and beyond this allocation and the one previously received under a Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) “High Priority Project” allocation;
RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the Town of Enfield accepts the responsibility for obtaining and providing the additional funding required for the completion of the project.
Councilman Fiore questioned if the $350,000 in the capital improvement budget which was presented to the Council last week are monies out of the Towns budget for capital improvement projects, not the match. Mr. Shanley explained that would be the match in part. He stated the total match at this point appears to be $680,000 to leverage the $2 million plus the $1.25 million. He noted there are a number of ways to get there, however, the question is does the Town wish to commit to it. He stated this is what CRCOG needs to know before they vote on whether or not to award the $2 million dollar grant. He noted one of the options is to reprogram funds that were programmed in the previous three years. He stated theoretically the Town could also use Road 2000 funds as the match to leverage that money because the Road 2000 referendum is $15 million dollars local, $21.6 million total, with that difference being various grants. He noted the important thing at this time is to agree to that amount to match in order to leverage the $3.25 million.
Councilman Kaupin stated he was approached by the hunters association that runs a shooting range in this area. He noted this group is concerned with the public having access very close to their rifle range. He questioned at what point in time will that concern be addressed with them and how does this impact the use of their range. Mr. Shanley stated they would also have to address that issue as they move forward with the Frank Mancuso Park because that park is adjacent to that shooting range. Mr. Kazmarski stated DOT has expressed a concern about this, but their concern was to make sure that all applicable safety standards that apply to a firing range are followed. Councilman Kaupin stated at some point in time they will need to address the concerns of the hunters association.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5207 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5208 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield resolved on November 20, 2000 to authorize the Town Manager to pursue, by eminent domain, an easement right at 89 Elm Street, in order to secure roadway improvements to Route 220 required by the State Traffic Commission associated with the mall expansion for 2001; and
WHEREAS, engineering work continued and a redesign for the road improvements has been approved by the State Department of Transportation that obviates the need for the aforementioned taking; and
WHEREAS, the objective of substantial roadway improvements to Route 220 will still occur, at the expense of the developer, without said easement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the Town of Enfield acts to rescind Resolution #4934 as the road improvements have been approved by the state without referenced easement.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5208 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5209 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Vayda.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO: Personnel $7,000.00
Account #1700-0540
FROM: Contingency $7,000.00
Account #8030-840
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the amount of $7,000.00 is available from Account #8030-840 as of March 27, 2001.
/s/ Gregory Simmons, Director of Finance
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5209 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5210 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
RESOLVED, that the Town Manager, Scott Shanley, is empowered to enter into and amend contractual instruments in the name and on behalf of the Town of Enfield with the Department of Social Services of the State of Connecticut for a School Readiness/Child Day Care Program 07-01-2001 to 06-30-2002 and to affix the Corporate Seal.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5210 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5211 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan.
RESOLVED, that the Town Manager, Scott Shanley, is empowered to enter into and amend contractual instruments in the name and on behalf of the Town of Enfield with the Department of Social Services of the State of Connecticut for a Youth Services Bureau 7-1-2001 to 6-30-2002 and to affix the Corporate Seal.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5211 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5212 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan.
RESOLVED, that the Town Manager, Scott Shanley, is empowered to enter into and amend contractual instruments in the name and on behalf of the Town of Enfield with the Department of Social Services of the State of Connecticut for a Family Resource Center Program 7-1-2001 to 6-30-2002 and to affix the Corporate Seal.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5212 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5213 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Vayda to rescind Items g., h., and i.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5213 adopted 9-0-0.
AMENDMENT #1 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan to eliminate the wording “Department of Social Services” and insert the wording “State Department of Education” for Items g., h., i., and j.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared AMENDMENT #1 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5213A by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to waive the reading of Items g., h., i., and j.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5213A adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5214 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to pass Item g. as amended. (School Readiness/Child Day Care Grant)*
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5214 adopted
9-0-0.
MOTION #5215 by Councilman Giddings, seconded by Councilman Hall to pass Item h. as amended. (Youth Service Bureau Grant)*
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5215 adopted
9-0-0.
MOTION #5216 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Egan to pass Item i. as amended. (Family Resource Center Grant)*
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5216 adopted
9-0-0.
MOTION #5217 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Egan to pass item j as amended. (Summer Food Program Grant)*
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5217 adopted
9-0-0.
*Resolutions appended to minutes
RESOLUTION #5218 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
RESOLVED, that the Enfield Town Council will hold a Public Hearing in the Enfield Town Hall Council Chambers, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Monday, May 7, 2001 at 7:15 p.m. to allow interested citizens an opportunity to express their opinion regarding the PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5218 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5219 by Councilman Giddings, seconded by Councilman Falk.
RESOLVED, that the Enfield Town Council will hold a public hearing in the Enfield Town Hall Council Chambers, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Monday, May 7, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. to allow interested citizens an opportunity to express their opinions and suggestions regarding the submission of a Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program Application to HUD.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5219 adopted 9-0-0.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS
Councilman Mangini stated she received a complaint regarding defective playground equipment at Parkman School. She noted it had something to do with the fire pole. Mr. Vindigni made note of this.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #5220 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5220 adopted 9-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 11:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeannette Lamontagne
Secretary to the Council
Suzanne F. Olechnicki
Town Clerk
Clerk of the Council
|
| |