|
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 7, 2001
A Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was held in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Wednesday, February 7, 2001. Chairwoman Strom called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m.
PRAYER The Prayer was given by Councilman Dodd.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL Present were Councilmen Dodd, Egan, Falk, Fiore, Giddings, Hall, Kaupin, Mangini, Strom, and Vayda. Councilman McGuire was absent. Also present were Town Manager, Scott A. Shanley; Assistant Town Manager, Daniel Vindigni; Town Clerk, Suzanne F. Olechnicki; Town Attorney, Christopher W. Bromson; Director of Public Works, John Kazmarski; Director of Finance, Gregory Simmons; Assistant Director of Public Works, Carlo Bonavita; Zoning Enforcement Officer, Wayne Bickley; Chief of Police, Ronald Marcotte; Director of Information Systems, Charlene Bond; Recreation Supervisor, Mary Keller; Director of Social Services, Dorothy Allen; Deputy Director of Social Services, Marla Hauslaib; Executive Director of Enfield Day Care, Joan Colon; Senior Citizens Center Director, Kay Tallarita.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #5070 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Vayda to accept the minutes of the January 16, 2001 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5070 adopted 8-0-2, with Councilmen Kaupin and Giddings abstaining.
MOTION #5071 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Hall to accept the minutes of the January 16, 2001 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5071 adopted 8-0-2, with Councilmen Kaupin and Giddings abstaining.
MOTION #5072 by Councilman Giddings, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to accept the minutes of the January 25, 2001 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5072 adopted 9-0-1, with Councilman Dodd abstaining.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Terry Jedynak, 196 Hazard Avenue
Stated some people have come forward to serve on committees, but they have not heard anything. She questioned if theres a procedure for the submittal of applications.
Referring to an article in Connecticut Magazine, Ms. Jedynak pointed out Enfield ranked low 26 out of 32 towns. She noted this ranking had to do with education, crime, cost of living, economy, and culture. She voiced concern about the Town becoming complacent and suggested perhaps a committee could be brought together to try and improve Enfield. Ms. Jedynak noted she did write a letter to the Town Manager regarding her concern, but has not heard anything yet.
Connie Boyajian, 165 Sherman Road
Stated her belief a large pool to serve the whole community is not the answer. She stated her belief the Green Manor area will lose a sense of community if they lose their pool.
Gerald Fitzsimons, 34 Walnut Street
Spoke as Chairman of Save Our Strand, Inc. He noted recent news articles have drawn attention to the Enfield Town Councils highest priority list and that the Strand Theater restoration project is not among them. He pointed out several of the chosen priorities have a significant potential impact on efforts to restore the Strand and create a community arts center. He noted the Freshwater Pond reclamation project is directly opposite the Strand. He pointed out this pond has a tremendous impact on the viability of the Strand project. He stated restoration on both sides of North Main Street will make the area attractive to development and community use. He noted attention to historic town structures, including several in Thompsonville, adds to the viability of revitalization for this entire area. He stated building the Family Resource Center in Thompsonville is an innovative approach to some unique neighborhood challenges, and is designed to strengthen the fabric of the community.
Mr. Fitzsimmons stated economic viability is always important in understanding the demographics, the assets, the needs and the potential of the community.
He pointed out referendum projects for schools, senior center, and recreation study implementation are about quality of life in this community. He stated the impacts and the correlations seem obvious and can only mean good news.
He referred to open space land acquisition related to waterfront properties and the Connecticut River frontage in the Thompsonville area which has significant potential for drawing more people into the area.
Mr. Fitzsimons referred to the goal regarding analyzing the need and a budget for appropriate village parking, and noted one of the greatest challenges for the Strand project is parking.
He stated the Strand project is best done as a public/private venture and is not a quick fix. He noted to expect this project to be at the top of everyones agenda all of the time is unrealistic. He stated to expect support at critical junctures is not unrealistic. He pointed out to date, that support has been there and indications are strong that the support will continue.
Attorney Dorian Riser, representing Myers Nursery, Inc. (owner of 48 acres on the west side of Laughlin Road, immediately north of the Ellington/Enfield town line.)
Attorney Riser stated theyre present this evening to comment on the consideration of designating a portion of Laughlin Road as a scenic road. Her comments follow:
"We would like to call your attention to the appropriateness of designating this portion of the road as scenic because I think when you look at that, you have to look at more than just the specific criteria that you set forth in your enabling legislation. I think you have to look at as to what might be gained by the Town in designating as a scenic road. I think if were considering that the action would be an effort to relieve the Town of its responsibility to make improvements on this road, I would submit that this goal is not achievable. The statute is very, very clear. Theres a specific section in the statute that says that the town will remain responsible for maintaining the road in good repair and in passable condition. Youve got some ample evidence now of public record that your town staff and departments and Planning & Zoning do not feel that Laughlin Road is in a passable condition or in good repair. I was just recently in front of the Planning & Zoning Commission the last few months with regards to th and spoke in favor of the enabling legislation and stated that this was a win-win situation for the Town of Enfield. So far, I dont really see the win for the Town of Enfield. I see a situation being created that may effectively tie your hands in responding to future development in the area that cries out for development in the area, all for the benefit of a half dozen residents or so who are playing the "not in my backyard" game with you. They are using this as leverage as an anti-development tool I would submit. If you have any questions, Id be happy to answer them, and I thank you for your time."
Laurie Catelono, 52 Brewster
Noted she is present due to an article in the Journal Inquirer on Saturday regarding the Enfield Day Care Center. She stated her two children have been with Enfield Day Care for almost six years, and the contemplation of that center closing would be difficult. She noted she is a single parent, and in the past six years, theyve gone from a poverty level income. She pointed out during that period she was attending school full-time to get her degree in mechanical engineering, and the Day Care Center saw her through this period. She noted she never had to worry about the care of her children, and the pay scale helped her during this period.
She stated she has friends who are always struggling about day care, but Enfield Day Care is consistent in their service. She stated her belief this service is a very necessary part of this community and is very supportive of single parents and children. She noted the staff is always professional. She emphasized many parents are dependent on this service, and she hopes it will always be here.
Patricia Margolfo, 11 Eileen Lane
Stated her son has been going to Enfield Day Care for over a year and a half and before that he was enrolled in several different day care facilities, from private to other group services. She noted her son has special needs, and Enfield Day Care has been the only facility that has been able to address his needs. She stated hes very happy at this Center. She pointed out Enfield Day Care is very supportive of the children academically as well and provides help with childrens homework. She stated her belief it would be a terrible loss for Enfield if this Center closed down. She stated her hope the Town will find another location for this service.
Matthew Smith, 66 Yale Drive
Stated his daughter is in the fifth grade at Enfield Street School and has been at the Enfield Day Care for 13 months. He noted the benefits of this day care are many, but primarily for him is the security of the Day Care Center and the trust that comes from taking his child there. He stated he found he could immediately trust this group with his childs safety and well-being because of the accountability factor, the accountability that is automatically part of the program thats funded and managed by the Town. He stated he is proud of Enfield for having such a program and he disagrees with the rating that Connecticut Magazine gave the Town of Enfield.
Joan Suzor (an employee of the Enfield Day Care Center)
Noted she has been employed by the Center in different capacities since 1977. She noted she has been with the center as it changed locations several times. She stated right now, shes working towards a credential program, and this is a pilot program through the UCONN extension program which would train individuals in school-age child care so that there will be adequately trained personnel to do this job.
Allen Torrent, 45 Laughlin Road
Spoke about the Laughlin Road issue. He noted he supports designating Laughlin Road as a scenic byway. He stated the advantages to this town in keeping some areas pristine are tough to argue when it involves prime bottomland which is easy to develop. He noted the site development of flat, excellent land is immensely cheaper than developing hilly or treed land. He stated the temptation to develop land such as this is very high. He noted he cant necessarily say its in the Towns best interest that it forever preserve agricultural land or scenic byways if its to the Towns advantage to build a school or additional housing. He stated its up to the Council to figure out the pros and cons, i.e., tax income and services provided. He noted he would suggest if its close in terms of tax income vs obligation to services provided, that the Council might want to consider doing anything that serves the interest of agricultural preservation. He pointed out theres limited prime agricultural land remaining in Connecticut. He noted hes convinced of the advisability of preserving agricultural land so that its ready to serve people if its needed. He stated his belief it behooves the Town to think of its own future. He added his feeling its poor judgment to let go of the very best of our agricultural lands due to the ease of site development and due to the desire to have a broader tax base.
Mr. Torrent stated a lot of Enfield is developed, and Laughlin Road could actually serve its purpose as a scenic road. He pointed out there are very few pure scenic vistas left in the Town of Enfield.
Mr. Torrent stated there is a substantial hill on Laughlin Road that rises up and goes down and makes almost a 90 degree bend. He noted this is a substantial hill and if the road was to be made safe, the Town would be put in the position of taking that land by eminent domain and leveling acres of earth on either side of this hill, which wouldnt address the fact that theres still a severe bend at that point. He added there is also a spring that bubbles up at the point of this turn. He noted that spring will bubble up even through an asphalt road.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
MOTION #5073 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to add Item 11c under New Business (Laughlin Road resolution) and Item 12h under Items for Discussion (Town of Enfield v. Bernard Cope, et al.)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5073 adopted 10-0-0.
Councilman Kaupin distributed letters from Myron and Connie Boyajian of Sherman Road regarding Green Manor pool. He noted his sentiments are echoed in these letters, in that its important that they keep a pool in the Green Manor area.
Councilman Kaupin addressed Ms. Jedynaks comments regarding applicants for commissions. He noted he would be interested in seeing the applications that Ms. Jedynak referred to. He stated typically there are some appointed positions that the Council just reviews and if theres an opening, they do it at that specific time. He noted there are other appointments that tend to be more political in nature, and those applications go to the Town Committees. He stated those applications go to the Candidate Review Committee, and theres an interview process and a recommendation from a Town Committee.
Councilman Kaupin thanked people for voicing their support for Enfield Day Care. He noted this is an important Center. He noted the Council would prefer that the Day Care remain in its current location, unfortunately that cant happen so theyre grappling with the issue of trying to find a new location. He stated the Felician Sisters are willing to keep the Day Care on a month-to-month basis while the Town is working on this issue.
Councilman Egan referred to Ms. Jedynaks comments regarding the Connecticut Magazine article and the idea of a committee to see what direction the Town is going in. She noted the Town did have a Plan of Conservation that took two full years to accomplish, involving neighborhood meetings. She noted every organization in Enfield was contacted, including the Board of Education and subcommittees were set up and there was full-blown input from the whole community. She pointed out there has been a lot of enthusiastic response to exactly what direction the Town is going to go in the future. She noted that Plan is on file.
Councilman Egan stated she personally knows how wonderful the Enfield Day Care is. She noted it is very well run, and is a jewel of this community. She noted the Governors speech today was all about State and local partnerships as concerns welfare-to-work and getting people to help themselves, and day care is a huge part of that.
Councilman Mangini agreed with previous comments about the Enfield Day Care. She commended Dorothy Allen, Joan Colon and all the people who work for Enfield Day Care. She noted this is an irreplaceable service.
Councilman Mangini commended the Public Works Department for the work theyve done on the roads.
Councilman Mangini stated a "No Parking" sign ended up on the lawn at 46 Brainard Road, and she requested the Police Department and/or Public Works Department check into this.
Councilman Mangini stated she attended the Connecticut Education Conference with Councilman Hall and Deputy Mayor Falk this weekend. She noted this is another example of Enfield coming together as a home and school community. She stated this was very well attended.
Councilman Mangini stated she and Mayor Strom attended United Studios After School Program function last month. She read the thank you note from United Studios for putting on this function.
Councilman Giddings spoke in strong support of the Enfield Day Care and noted he will do everything in his power to support this program.
As concerns the Connecticut Magazine article, Councilman Giddings noted many things in print can be interpreted in different ways. He stated his understanding Enfield is number 27 in a list of 32. He noted there are 169 towns in Connecticut, and the fact that 32 are listed means that those that werent listed are lower than those 32. He pointed out Enfield is actually 22 out of 169 towns, which means there are 142 towns doing not as well as Enfield. He went on to note one of the criteria for this ranking was culture. He stated for years he has been involved with Save Our Strand, Inc., and the vision is to make this a cultural arts center. He suggested anyone who feels that Enfield is not doing
its part in keeping up with culture should contact Save Our Strand, Inc. to see what they can do to bring this to fruition.
MOTION #5074 by Councilman Hall, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to add Item i. under Items for Discussion. (Appointment to the School Projects Building Committee)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5074 adopted 10-0-0.
Councilman Hall stated the Town Manager spoke at a previous meeting regarding the Connecticut Magazine article. She suggested perhaps the Town Manager could reiterate what he said about that article.
Councilman Hall suggested perhaps they should take a more proactive stance in providing more specifics about Enfield.
MOTION #5075 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Hall to move Item 12b up on the agenda to be addressed under Item 10 b. 11. (Senior Center Building Committee Report)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5075 adopted 10-0-0.
Referring to comments from Ms. Jedynak about submitted applications not being responded to, Councilman Fiore stated this year the Democratic Town Committee is keeping a file, and he can personally attest that everyone who applies has been contacted by one of the Councilmen.
Referring to Ms. Jedynaks comments regarding the Connecticut Magazine article and the implication that the Town of Enfield has become complacent over the years, Councilman Vayda pointed out a lot of work has been done to identify what some of the needs are in Enfield. He stated the Town is going flat out and Town staff is working very hard. He noted they have on-going road improvements from a road referendum that was passed; the School Building Committee is very active and working on improvements to most of the schools; theyre getting geared up for a new high school library; a new senior center is being built; recreation projects are upcoming.
Chairwoman Strom commended the Public Works Department for the work they did during the recent snowstorm. She noted she received many complimentary phone calls regarding the snow removal.
Chairwoman Strom stated United Studios has a program called "Kids for Life", and they recently did a grant that allowed 27 children in the After School Program to be funded free of charge under their grant to be able to take this martial arts course. She noted theres been a tremendous difference in the attitude, behavior and grades of those students involved in this course.
Chairwoman Strom referred to Ms. Jedynaks concerns about applications being ignored and stated she and the Town Manager try to respond to everything that comes in. She noted unfortunately, that does not always happen, and she apologized.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Shanley stated when applications are received for vacancies on Committees, the standard procedure is to send a letter acknowledging receipt of the application. He noted the Town Council gets copies of those and they receive a number of them in every packet.
Mr. Shanley stated his belief it would be worthwhile talking with Connecticut Magazine about the criteria and methodology they use to rank towns. He noted Enfield is compared to other communities of similar population sizes. He pointed out most of those other communities are not hub communities such as Enfield. He stated Enfields population doubles during the day, and the crime rate is calculated against the night time population. He noted the police activity reports will not necessarily reflect the population of the town as concerns arrests and where the arrested people come from. He stated he has spoken to the editor of Connecticut Magazine in the past regarding Enfields cultural rating and the fact they are not taking into consideration Enfields access to Springfield and Hartford with respect to cultural opportunities. He stated his understanding a lot of the culture is also driven by the number of volumes of books per capita in the library. He noted he would like to take a look at this to see exactly what theyre counting and whether theyre taking into consideration other libraries in Enfield, i.e., public school libraries. He pointed out the challenges for municipalities the sizes of Enfield are very unique because they have many of the issues that are faced by the larger cities but not necessarily some of the resources that some of the larger cities have.
Chairwoman Strom pointed out Enfield also has an excellent community college.
Mr. Shanley stated he will work with Connecticut Magazine to identify where they are and how theyre coming up with their conclusions.
Referring to the Cottage Green home for sale, Mr. Shanley stated the People for People group has expressed interest, but are not able to be involved at this time. He noted in consideration of that, staff believes its best not to exercise an option on that house, but
rather work with People for People so that when something else comes up, they can look at this opportunity again.
MOTION #5076 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Giddings to add Item j. to Items for Discussion. (Cottage Green property)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5076 adopted 10-0-0.
Mr. Shanley stated the Town received very many complimentary phone calls regarding the snow removal for the past couple snowstorms. Councilman Falk questioned the status of the snow removal budget. Mr. Shanley stated he does not have those numbers as yet.
Councilman Kaupin questioned what the policy is regarding clearing snow off its own walkways. Mr. Shanley indicated hed check into that.
Mr. Shanley informed the Council that the Planning & Zoning Commissions decision to reject the development on Laughlin Road has been appealed by the developer.
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
There was no formal report this evening.
REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL
Councilman Kaupin stated the Condominium Subcommittee cancelled their Tuesday meeting and this will be rescheduled for later in the month.
Councilman Kaupin noted the Town Green Advisory Committee cancelled their February meeting. He went on to note that Mr. DAleo at Rogers Memorial has informed Enfield Builders that they now have the bricks necessary for engraving, and Stoneware has received the deposit on the fountain and plans to deliver it to the Town at the beginning of May. He noted Mary Keller will be checking with the Public Works Department to see where they stand with regards to the preliminary work that needs to be done before delivery. He stated the completion of the fountain should be accomplished by the second week in May.
Councilman Hall referred to the School Projects Building Committee and informed the Council that the JFK and Eli Whitney plans were approved by Planning & Zoning.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
There were no Town Council appointments.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN MANAGER)
MOTION #5077 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Egan to accept the Town Managers recommendation to remove from the table Item #10.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5077 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #5078 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to accept the Town Managers recommendation to reappoint Gertrude Dorous (D) to the Commission on Aging for a term which expires 12/31/03.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5078 adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: SENIOR CENTER BUILDING COMMITTEE REPORT
Present from the Senior Center Building Committee were Assistant Director of Public Works, Carlo Bonavita, Russell Maylott, Chairperson, Samuel McGill, Vice-Chairperson and Thomas Kealey, Secretary.
Mr. Maylott presented the Committees progress report. He noted the Committee has accomplished the following:
o Established the structure of the Committee, electing a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary. Established "Rules of Order" and a process for the rotation of alternate members of the Committee.
o Authorized Phase I and Phase II environmental testing in order to facilitate the purchase of property on Elm Street, as selected by the Town Council.
o Selected the architectural firm of Lazarus & Sargeant to design the new Enfield Senior Center.
o Accepted a proposed "footprint" of the building, as proposed by Lazarus & Sargeant, which establishes the necessary Social Service space, while keeping the building within the 24,000 square foot limit as ordered by referendum.
o Selected the engineering firm of F.A. Hesketh for survey/site plan services.
o A decision on the site plan, as proposed by F.A. Hesketh based on the anticipated purchase of the "Elm Street" property, is expected within 30 days.
Mr. McGill presented a financial recap as follows:
Project Budget $4,300,000
Expenditures to date: ~
Architectural/Engineering $19,730.00
Testing/Inspections $15,340.00
Advertising/Administration $ 165.12
Total $35,135.12
Balance $4,264,864.88
Committed funding
Land Acquisition $256,200.00
Architectural/Engineering $153,640.00
Mr. Bonavita then presented and explained an illustration of the floor plan for the senior center.
Councilman Dodd questioned whether there was a specific reason for putting the Dial-A-Ride to the back end of the building. Mr. Bonavita stated the Dial-A-Ride is anticipated to be off the back portion of the social services offices and this would make easy access for their drivers to come in and out of that facility.
Councilman Hall questioned whether they will be able to supply all the equipment needed for this building. Mr. Bonavita stated the exercise equipment and computers were included in a grant. He added theres a furniture and fixtures allowance within the amount for the senior center.
Chairwoman Strom questioned why the building is facing away from the road. Mr. Bonavita stated this allows for closer parking to the front entrance.
Councilman Falk questioned if the Committee took future expansion into consideration. Mr. Bonavita noted the Committee did look at that, and it appears theres room for expansion.
Councilman Falk questioned if theres a driveway around the building for fire safety, and Mr. Bonavita responded yes, there will be access all around the building.
Councilman Fiore expressed appreciation for the hard work done by this Committee.
Mr. Bonavita stated this building will have a stucco/brick veneer, and its designed to allow a lot of natural light into the building.
Discussion followed about whether this building could be used as an emergency refuge. Mr. Shanley stated the Town already has well-planned shelters in Town. Mr. Vindigni stated JFK Middle School is considered a good place of refuge and is equipped to be a shelter. He noted Fermi and Enfield High Schools are back-up shelters. Mr. Shanley added they need to consider the full implication of designating a place as an emergency shelter.
Councilman Vayda stated his impression Enfield is already well served by emergency shelters.
Councilman Vayda questioned the amount of landscaping around the building, and Mr. Bonavita stated the concepts hes seen have shown a lot of landscaping around the entire property.
Councilman Hall questioned the timeline for groundbreaking. Mr. Bonavita stated its their hope groundbreaking will take place in June with a 10 to 12 month construction schedule.
MOTION #5079 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Vayda to remove Item c. from the agenda.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5079 adopted 10-0-0.
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE ORDINANCE
Mr. Shanley stated the Council has been given a package of information and proposals regarding property maintenance and blight components. He noted there are five components to this package. He noted the Council needs to decide how they wish to proceed from this point.
Councilman Giddings referred to the definition for unregistered vehicles and how that effects farm work equipment and car restoration. Chief Marcotte stated theres a specific state statute that exempts farm equipment. As concerns car restoration, he noted they have to be garaged.
Councilman Giddings questioned if junked cars would be allowed in a lot that is owned by someone with a license to sell cars. Mr. Shanley stated an automobile dealership would store unregistered motor vehicles, therefore, theyd be exempt. Councilman Giddings questioned how this applies to unregistered motor vehicles that are inoperable. Chief Marcotte stated they would then fall under the ordinance. Mr. Shanley added it does allow for 30 days as concerns an inoperable car.
Councilman Fiore referred to Page 3 and stated it appears they are given 70 days to remove a vehicle. Chief Marcotte clarified that would be 70 days before the Police Department tows the car.
Councilman Fiore questioned whether there have been any complaints about large mobile homes. Mr. Bickley stated one camper type vehicle is allowed.
Councilman Mangini referred to the U.S. Constitution and expressed concern about the government determining whats unsightly. Attorney Bromson stated all of the municipal powers spring forth from the State, which says police powers have to be based on a towns legitimate concern for public health and safety. He noted if they totally strayed from having any definitions or making any judgments, then it becomes so general as to be unenforceable, therefore, they have to walk the line, and theyre guided by case law and the courts interpretation when they have had these challenges of ordinances in other towns in Connecticut and federal court. He explained they are guided by those court decisions to try to at least go with whats been tried and true, and this ordinance strives to do that.
Councilman Kaupin questioned whether this vehicle ordinance is enforceable, and Chief Marcotte stated the Town Attorney has indicated that it is enforceable.
Councilman Kaupin referred to lawn height, and he feels it might be difficult to regulate a one-foot height limitation.
Councilman Vayda thanked Town staff for all their work on this. He questioned if the automobile ordinance closes a lot of loopholes and relieves the enforcement people of all the ambiguities that they had up until this point. Chief Marcotte stated they should now be able to enforce based on this ordinance.
Councilman Egan stated her belief this is a good working document, and she would like to move quickly on at least some of these items.
It was the consensus of the Council to move forward with the motor vehicle and solid waste ordinance.
Mr. Shanley stated staff will put something together for the next meeting to move things along.
MOTION #5080 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Vayda to retable this item.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5080 adopted 10-0-0.
Referring to Item d. Land Use Board - Chairwoman Strom stated she would like to put together a list to go out to the other members of the subcommittee, and at the same time, send that list to the Town Attorney. She noted some things need to be reviewed.
Items e. and f. remained tabled.
MOTION #5080A by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to remove Item g. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5080A adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION COMMITTEE
Mr. Shanley stated there was an earlier meeting tonight when there was discussion as to whether there should be two separate bodies an Inland/Wetlands body and a Conservation Commission, rather than being combined as it currently is. He stated his impression there was very strong consensus on the part of the current Conservation Commission to create two bodies. He noted if theres consensus by the Council to create two bodies, then he could work with leadership to fill in some of the details.
Councilman Falk stated he is looking for a time table in order to achieve a possible July 1st implementation of two bodies. Mr. Shanley agreed thats possible.
Chairwoman Strom stated her impression the Conservation Commission agrees with a July 1st implementation. She added the Conservation Commission indicated they should be able to make a decision by May 1st as to whether individual members will be serving on one or both bodies.
There was a consensus by the Council that Town staff can move forward to create documents to move forward.
MOTION #5081 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to retable this item.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5081 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #5082 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini to remove Item h. from the agenda. (Discussion re: EHS Library)
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5082 adopted 10-0-0.
Items i. and j. remained tabled.
MOTION #5083 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to address Item f. under Items for Discussion after the Camp, Dresser & McKee discussion.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5083 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #5084 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to remove Item k. from the agenda.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5084 adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE RECREATIONAL STUDY
Mr. Shanley stated theres a memorandum in the Councils packet which summarizes previous discussions.
RESOLUTION #5085 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO: 310-01-2001-3100-8816-335-00 $400,000.00
Recreation Study ~
FROM: 310-01-1995-3900-8510-450-00 $ 14,124.44
310-01-1996-3900-8510-450-00 $200,000.00
310-01-1997-3900-8510-450-00 $ 99,200.00
310-01-1998-3900-8510-450-00 $ 86,675.56
~ Landfill Closure $400,000.00
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the amount of $400,000.00 is available from Account # (see above) as of February 2, 2001.
/s/ Gregory Simmons, Director of Finance
Mr. Shanley stated they are looking for direction from the Council.
Councilman Hall stated she likes the entire list compiled and presented at the last meeting.
Councilman Mangini stated she would like the Town to remain aware of the handicapped children that need to have accessible facilities.
Councilman Falk stated theres currently not enough money to address everything on the list and he feels they need to discuss the priority of that list.
Councilman Kaupin agreed with Councilman Falk. He stated his belief they need to look at what they now have and bring that up to a level the Town can be proud of. He noted he would first support the construction of VFW Park, the soccer fields at Shaker Field and the safety improvements for existing playgrounds and playground equipment including Hazardville Village and Wallop Park.
Councilman Kaupin stated his belief the Angelo Lamagna and Green Manor pools should be maintained since they are very much part of the community they serve.
Councilman Vayda stated his impression the soils beneath the Green Manor pool are not suitable for a pool. He noted hes opposed to rebuilding the pool at the Green Manor Park and feels they should look at alternatives.
As concerns maintaining and repairing existing facilities, Councilman Vayda stated his belief safety comes first. He stated his belief they should have a long-term plan so that they can begin to replace equipment in a scheduled manner.
Councilman Egan stated her belief they need more information regarding the location of a centralized pool. She questioned how close to the senior center would they place a new pool. She voiced concern about such a facility being placed too close to the senior center due to noise levels.
Councilman Fiore distributed documentation he put together regarding monies for recreational needs. He noted he took the Town Managers suggestion of the $400,000 from the landfill closure, combined it with the $246,000 from closed-out CIP projects, and included the current playground CIP allocations of $47,000; current VFW Park CIP allocation of $50,000; Asnuntuck allocation of $75,000; Green Manor - $75,000; Shaker Soccer-$57,000. He stated this added up could accomplish the following items:
o Hazard Village Park
o Wallop Park
o Whitacres Park
o VFW Park
o 3 skateboard parks at Parkman School, Green Manor Park, Fermi High School
o two soccer fields at the Shaker Complex
Councilman Fiore stated there would still be approximately $400,000 which could be used for design work on Mancuso Park, Brainard Park, Asnuntuck School, the remainder of Green Manor Park, a centrally located pool, and Enfield High and Fermi High field replacements.
Mr. Shanley stated if theres consensus with Councilman Fiores suggestions, that is what staff had in mind. He went on to point out there needs to be drainage work at the Whitacres Park. Councilman Fiore stated they could at least start with the playground equipment.
Councilman Falk stated he doesnt get the impression theyll be addressing safety issues at existing parks. Councilman Vayda suggested perhaps they should instruct Town staff to look at this list and look at the rest of the playground equipment to be sure theyre not overlooking any safety issues.
Referring to Frank Mancuso Park, Brainard Park, and a centralized pool, Councilman Hall questioned whether they would need the comprehensive plans fairly quickly to go out for referendum in November. Mr. Shanley stated theyd need to be able to develop conceptual plans to a level where they would have some real cost numbers, and theyd need this information probably in May.
Councilman Dodd questioned how much area a skateboard park consumes. Mr. Shanley stated according to CDM, converting tennis courts is a very practical and reasonable thing to do.
Councilman Dodd questioned how many skateboarders can be accommodated in such a skateboard park and how much parking space would such a facility require. Mr. Shanley indicated they will get more information on this.
Councilman Kaupin stated it might be premature to go forward with a skateboard park at Green Manor Park until its known what will be done regarding the pool and that whole area. Mr. Shanley stated CDM indicated that because the skateboard parks are modular, they can be temporary.
Councilman Kaupin stated he cannot support removing a neighborhood asset, such as a neighborhood pool.
Councilman Hall stated the CDM study does not talk about shutting down the Green Manor Park, but rather having a water park. She noted she saw a dynamic display of a water park. She questioned whether that neighborhood would enjoy this type of water facility more.
Councilman Giddings stated there are a lot of people in the Green Manor area that use that pool for swimming lessons, and the older people in the neighborhood use it for water aerobics. He noted these activities cant take place with a water spray park.
Councilman Mangini agreed with Councilman Kaupin.
Chairwoman Strom stated her belief they should pursue further discussion on the Green Manor pool. She questioned if theres consensus from the Council on at least the playgrounds and the skateboard parks so that the Town Manager can be told to move forward on those items.
Mr. Shanley requested including the engineering for fields for the Shaker Complex.
Councilman Dodd questioned how much money will be spent with these suggestions, and Chairwoman Strom stated theyd be spending a portion of the $400,000 approximately $300,000.
The Council agreed with Chairwoman Strom and Mr. Shanleys suggestions.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5085 adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES POLICY
Present for this discussion were Dorothy Allen, Joan Colon and Marla Hauslaib.
Ms. Allen stated Enfield Day Care is 31 years old and it was started by a coalition of churches and for many years a board of directors made up of church representatives and parents ran the program until it grew so much beyond them that they could no longer do it. She stated it then reverted to the Town. She pointed out this program was started as a result of people in the community seeing this need for children who were not able to get care and to relieve the problem of "latch-key" children.
Ms. Allen stated providing day care is a daunting task for working single parents. She noted there are still an inordinate amount of very young children who leave school to return to an empty home.
Councilman Falk stated his belief it would be a crime to do away with this service. He noted the state and federal government works very hard to eliminate welfare and the emphasis is to put people to work. He noted without such day care, people wont be able to work.
Councilman Egan stated 90% of these children come from single family homes and if they didnt have this sliding scale, those parents probably couldnt afford day care. She noted the Town will have to work to find a place to relocate this program.
Councilman Kaupin raised some budgetary questions, and Mr. Shanley stated he will provide some figures.
Councilman Vayda questioned whether the Day Care gets referrals, and Ms. Colon stated about 15% are referrals.
Councilman Vayda questioned if the Day Care is at 100% capacity, and Ms. Colon responded no. Ms. Allen stated they may be at capacity in the Infant/Toddler component.
Councilman Vayda questioned if the same grants are available to the private sector, and Ms. Allen responded no.
Councilman Fiore questioned the number of out-of-town children out of the 167 participants. Ms. Allen responded 15 children are from out-of-town, and thats because the state requires them to take children from surrounding towns, but it would only involve infant/toddlers and pre-school children.
NEW BUSINESS
RESOLUTION #5086 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Vayda.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby approves the attached amended set of goals for 2001. (Appended to minutes)
Councilman Fiore suggested adding wording as follows to Goal #8:
"Continuing ongoing support for projects such as the National Purple Heart Museum, Save Our Strand and Athletic Hall of Fame Projects."
Chairwoman Strom stated her only problem with the additional wording is that its major projects that the Town is looking to support, and these are basically the three major projects in town.
Councilman Mangini agreed with Councilman Fiores suggested wording since it would mean there could be more projects coming later on.
Chairwoman Strom stated the Council goals are an ever-changing, on-going, living document that the Council looks at every year. She noted every year those goals can be and are adjusted.
Councilman Egan stated she prefers the original wording.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5086 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5087 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk.
BE IT RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VII, Section II of the Town Charter the Enfield Town Council does hereby adopt the job descriptions for the following positions: Head Children/Teen Services Librarian, Audiovisual Librarian, Children/Teen Librarian, Technical Processor, Town Managers Office Executive Secretary, Town Managers Office Administrative Secretary, Building Official, Lead Attendant II/Operations and Maintenance, Lead Attendant II/Shift Operator/Laboratory, Lead Attendant I, Collector of Delinquent Revenue, Adult Day Care Center Director, Deputy Director of Child Day Care, Administrative Supervisor and Senior Center Program Coordinator.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5087 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5088 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield pursuant to Connecticut General Statute Section 7-149a passed an ordinance establishing a procedure for the designation of a scenic road; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has received information and appropriate documentation which meets the criteria set out by the ordinance for consideration for designation as a scenic road;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Enfield hereby designates Laughlin Road as a scenic road in the definition in the Town ordinance and general statutes.
Councilman Falk requested the Town Attorney confirm that legal staff has reviewed this and everything is as it should be. Attorney Bromson stated to the best of their knowledge, this resolution and ordinance does comport with the State law.
Referring to a comment under Public Communications regarding whether a majority of the owners with lot frontage on this road had agreed to this process, Councilman Kaupin pointed out the Council has a letter from the Town Attorney that states 57.44% approve of this process.
Councilman Kaupin stated this designation is being sought after by the residents of Laughlin Road. He noted this is a beautiful road and should be preserved.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5088 adopted 10-0-0.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN MANAGER)
Appointments to the Conservation Commission will appear under New Business on the next agenda.
DISCUSSION RE: FRESHWATER POND LOCAL FUNDING
Councilman Fiore questioned when this project would start, and Mr. Kazmarski responded probably in December 2001. He noted he will support this, however, he questions why this has to be done now rather than through the budget process.
Councilman Falk stated he is concerned about the timing. He noted a lot of things need to be done, i.e., getting permits. He feels this could fail if they put things off. He stated his belief they need a commitment now.
Councilman Vayda questioned the rationale for moving on this earlier. He added his understanding that the permitting process can be lengthy.
Mr. Shanley stated this would put the money in place and create the structure to move forward, however, this is not mandatory.
Councilman Dodd stated his belief no one would berate the Council for being ahead of schedule. He added his belief they should move forward.
Councilman Kaupin stated he did not mind funding this now.
It was agreed the Town Manager could prepare something for the next meeting.
MOTION #5089 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Hall to suspend the rules to address Items d. g., h., i., and j. to Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5089 adopted 10-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: EHS BUILDING COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
Chairwoman Strom questioned whether any applications have been received. Councilman Mangini stated she has one person who came forward and his name is John Hogan. Chairwoman Strom stated her belief they should encourage people to fill out applications. She went on to note Councilman Giddings and Vayda are the Councils liaisons to this committee, and Nicholas Sinsigalli and Joyce Hall are the School Boards liaisons. She noted as in the past, they should have them look at the applications and come forward with recommendations.
Councilman Kaupin suggested a press release regarding this.
MISCELLANEOUS
RESOLUTION #5090 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Kaupin.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Manager, Scott Shanley, is empowered to execute and deliver in the name of the Town a contract with the Department of Labor, State of
Connecticut, and to accept the grant for implementation of Job Training contact #0J2420003415419.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5090 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #5091 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Egan to waive the reading of the resolution.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5091 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5092 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Egan.
A Resolution Authorizing Application for STP Urban Funds/Post Office Road/Town Farm Road Copy appended to these minutes.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5092 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5093 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Vayda.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Enfield Town Council does hereby authorize the Town Attorney, Christopher W. Bromson, to settle the outstanding condemnation proceedings in the actions entitled Town of Enfield v. Bernard Cope, et al., Docket No. CV 92-0051226S and Bernard Cope v. Town of Enfield. Docket No. CV 93-0052290S, for the amount of $20,400.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5093 adopted 10-0-0.
NOMINATION #5094 by Councilman Hall to appoint Michael Barrett as a regular member of the School Projects Building Committee.
MOTION #5095 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to close nominations.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5095 adopted 10-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared Michael Barrett appointed to the School Projects Building Committee by a 10-0-0 vote.
RESOLUTION #5096 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Vayda to withdraw the application for the purchase of 50 Cottage Green.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5096 adopted 10-0-0.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Myron Boyajian, 165 Sherman Road
Questioned whether the Green Manor pool will be open this summer, and if not, will the Fermi High School pool be available.
Mr. Shanley stated the intent is to try and get the Green Manor pool open. He explained that the head wall has to be repaired every year at a cost of about $15,000. He added the Green Manor pool is 46 years old and does not meet standards any longer.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS
There were no communications.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #5097 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Falk to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5097 adopted 10-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 11:56 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeannette Lamontagne
Secretary to the Council
By Suzanne F. Olechnicki
Suzanne F. Olechnicki
Town Clerk
Clerk of the Council
|