|
|
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 15, 2002
A Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was called to order by Chairman Vayda in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Monday, April 15, 2002 at 7:30 p.m.
PRAYER The Prayer was given by Chairman Vayda.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL Present were Councilmen Edgar, Falk, Fiore, Kaupin, Mangini, Strom, Tait, Tallarita, and Vayda. Councilmen Egan and Hall were absent. Also present were Town Manager, Scott A. Shanley; Town Clerk, Suzanne F. Olechnicki; Town Attorney, Christopher W. Bromson; Director of Public Works, John Kazmarski; Deputy Director of Public Works, Geoffrey McAlmond; Director of Finance, Gregory Simmons.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #5835 by Councilman Strom, seconded by Councilman Tallarita to accept the minutes of the April 1, 2002 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5835 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5836 by Councilman Mangini, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to accept the minutes of the April 1, 2002 Regular Meeting.
Referring to the first sentence on Page 12, Councilman Kaupin clarified this should read, The proposal would not have any impact…
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5836 adopted 9-0-0, as amended.
MOTION #5837 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Mangini to accept the minutes of the April 3, 2002 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5837 adopted 9-0-0.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Margaret Jedziniak, 232 Abbe Road
Requested an explanation as to why the Information Technology Departments for Enfield Public Schools and the Town Hall were merged at one time and why they were separated. She added she would like to know the cost of these decisions. She noted she would like specific documentation regarding her inquiry and requests this under Freedom of Information.
Ms. Jedziniak stated she recently read in the newspaper that Manchester is adding a portable classroom to their Head Start program. She noted Enfield is building a $3.6 million dollar Head Start building. She stated her belief taxpayers in Enfield cant afford this.
Frank Jedziniak, 232 Abbe Road
Suggested the Town and School systems have a more professional-looking sign for meeting notices. He noted these signs are not always up to notify the public of meetings.
Mrs. Collins, 25 Gordon Lane
Stated her impression that veterans were talked down to at the previous Council meeting.
Robert Tkacz, 1300 Enfield Street
Stated his impression Council meetings always have a police presence. He stated his belief this isnt necessary.
Mr. Tkacz stated his belief the Town Manager and Public Works Director should check into the Public Works Department because he feels employees have time to pick up bagels.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Councilman Tait thanked the Town Manger for the report on the old senior center inspection. He requested an agenda item be included when the full report becomes available.
Councilman Mangini requested Town staff locate the documentation regarding work done at the senior center in 1972. She went on to note there are some very needy services in Enfield that might possibly be accommodated in the old senior center. She agreed with Councilman Tait in that she would like to see an agenda item when the full inspection report becomes available.
Councilman Mangini thanked the Town Council on behalf of the Enfield Food Shelf regarding the volunteer appreciation night. She expressed appreciation to Joanne in the Town Managers office for producing a very nice certificate of appreciation.
Councilman Tallarita stated he received a phone call from a resident on Enfield Street concerning the deterioration of the tree belt. He noted this deterioration came about as a result of gas company work and then sidewalk repairs. He stated residents were told in the past that improvements would be made. Mr. Shanley indicated hed check into this.
Councilman Falk thanked the Town Manager for responding to a question concerning Meadow Road.
Councilman Falk stated he recently had the pleasure of attending the Arts Festival at Enfield High School. He noted this event was very well done. He stated his hope the Womens Club can continue this event in the future.
Councilman Falk stated Voices, Inc. recently put on outstanding performances with sold out crowds.
Councilman Falk stated the Cultural Arts Commission is sponsoring the U.S. Air Force Liberty Band at Fermi High School on May 7th at 7:00 p.m. He noted tickets are free and available through the Recreation Department.
Councilman Edgar stated he put in a request for clarification regarding the name of State Street. Mr. Shanley stated he will provide a report on this.
Councilman Edgar spoke of the need to make the walking area safe in the area of Windsor Court. Mr. Shanley indicated they will work on that.
Councilman Edgar stated he would like to see the American flags extended from the Parsons home to Old King Street. Councilman Falk pointed out the Beautification Committee handles this, and he suggested speaking to the committee about this.
Councilman Fiore thanked the Town Manager and Public Works Director for the information on Section 15 of the roads and sidewalk repair.
Councilman Fiore requested clarification as to who is responsible for the external boxes in the sidewalks the homeowners or the water company.
MOTION #5838 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Mangini to suspend the rules to add a discussion item to the agenda this evening regarding the current status of Susan Circle.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5838 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5839 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to suspend the rules to move Item c. under Items for Discussion to Item 9 a.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5839 adopted 9-0-0.
Councilman Kaupin stated he would like to be sure the marker in front of St. Marys Church is replaced after Phase II of the Hazardville Streetscape project.
Referring to Mr. Tkaczs comments about having the police present at the Council meeting, Councilman Kaupin stated there are credible reasons why the police are present. He pointed out its not only for the Councils safety, but also for the safety of the public attending these meetings.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Shanley agreed with Mr. Jedziniak in that there should be a sign in front of Town Hall announcing meetings.
Mr. Shanley stated they found the 1972 documentation regarding the old senior center and supplied that documentation to the structural engineer.
As concerns Old State Street, Mr. Shanley stated there was a request to change the name of the street, however, that request was made by someone who doesnt live on that street. He noted they petitioned the people who do live on that street as to how they feel about a name change, and they should have some responses this week. He pointed out when a street name is changed, individuals have to change all of their records, i.e., deeds, checking accounts, and all legal documents.
Mr. Shanley stated they are aware of the problem on Windsor Court, and they are working on an improvement to the situation.
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Attorney Bromson reported the second half of the hearing on Enfield Shade was concluded. He noted the judge promised to issue an opinion in writing within one week.
Referring to Freedom of Information, Attorney Bromson stated a hearing officer ordered them to provide a lot of documents beyond what they felt they should during a valid pending investigation. He noted the court agreed, it was remanded back, and theyre supposed to have a hearing on it tomorrow. He stated the hearing officer who initially had it, has dismissed it completely, therefore, theyre seeking some clarification. He noted they want to be assured that the prior decision is null and void and that it wasnt simply just dismissed without further clarification.
Chairman Vayda questioned if the Town Attorney has heard anything on the FOI complaint. Attorney Bromson stated he will be reporting on this as soon as he hears something.
REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL
Councilman Mangini stated she and Councilman Egan attended a Loan Review Committee emergency meeting recently, and they looked at a couple emergency roof/boiler issues. She noted theyre also looking at the possibility of setting one mandatory meeting per month where they look at all issues that come forward vs emergency type issues.
Councilman Kaupin stated last week he met with the School Building Committee. He stated the Committee generated a list for FF&E (furniture, fixtures, and equipment). He noted they will present this proposed FF&E list to the Board of Education. He stated he asked the School Building Committee to come before the Council as well to present this list along with the reasoning. He explained because the bids came in lower than anticipated, theyre able to fund FF&E out of the referendum dollars vs out of budgeted dollars. He stated that Committee is proposed to come before the Council at the first meeting in May.
Councilman Kaupin stated the Head Start groundbreaking will be on Monday, June 10th at 9:30 a.m. at the Head Start site.
DISCUSSION RE: CIVIC PARTICIPATION PRESENTATION
Present for this discussion were Jason Jones, Karen LaPlante, and Joan Smith, members of the Civic Participation Steering Committee.
Mr. Jones stated this is a project that was attended by many residents of the Town of Enfield. He noted they found that many towns are having difficulty in getting quality residents to participate in the government process.
He stated the Enfield Civic Participation Steering Committee consisted of 14 citizens, with representatives from the Board of Education, Town Council, civic leaders, business and church representatives, as well as representatives from non-profit groups.
Mr. Jones stated they developed a statement of purpose and vision statement. He noted the statement of purpose states, To identify the means for developing and maintaining civic participation in the Town of Enfield by focusing on the broadening of peoples knowledge of the role in civic government; new and expanded forms of communication and information and sharing with the public; open and honest sharing of information between boards and commissions; public recognition of volunteer service; seeking out and encouraging a diverse group of people to volunteer in civic government.
Mr. Jones stated the vision statement developed by the group states, The citizens of Enfield understand how their government works and take an active interest in the issues that effect the quality of life in Enfield. The Town of Enfield encourages a diverse group of people to volunteer for civic boards and commissions through honest and open communication, both to the public at large and between volunteer groups and recognition of their volunteer efforts.
Mr. Jones stated this group came up with many interesting ideas and suggestions. He urged the Council to read through their suggestions and he encouraged funding and implementation of as many items as possible.
He stated Enfield is a great town, and there are many people willing to participate in worthwhile projects, however, many people dont know how to go about it.
Mr. Jones referred to their report and noted there should be a correction as concerns the website campaign page in the last paragraph. He referred to the second line which reads, We do not feel… and stated not should be eliminated.
Councilman Tallarita questioned if there were any monies allotted within the grant in order to fund any of the initiatives. Mr. Jones responded just for the meetings. Mr. Shanley added the grant paid for the participation of the National Civic League and the staff from the National Civic League. He noted the Town paid for the meeting.
Councilman Tallarita questioned if this group pulled from best practices by calling some communities that have tried to implement some of these initiatives. Mr. Jones responded no, they just had discussion of what people within Enfield would like to see.
Councilman Fiore questioned what the next step might be. Mr. Jones stated his belief it would be deciding which of these initiatives are the most viable and can be accomplished in the least time-consuming manner.
Councilman Fiore questioned whether Mr. Jones would like the Council to keep this as an agenda item so they can digest this and address it after the budget process. Mr. Jones responded absolutely.
Councilman Fiore recommended this item remain on the agenda. He then referred to Strategy 1 within the report and the action step, Offer a tax break for participation on boards and commissions. He pointed out Council members receive no tax breaks or compensation. Ms. LaPlante pointed out a lot of the action steps were just ideas people had that might encourage people to participate more. She noted some of the ideas were generalizations, and some ideas were very specific. She stated they tried to present as many of the ideas as possible so that the Council and other people might get involved.
Councilman Kaupin commended this Committee for all their hard work. He questioned who this group envisions to be the promoter of this effort going forward. He question which body will be coordinating everyone and supervising events. Mr. Jones stated theyre at the point where they know what they want to do, but they dont have the people in place to do the work.
Mr. Jones stated as a steering committee their task is to be sure theyre going in the right direction, but theyre also looking for a commitment from the Town to be involved
Councilman Kaupin noted a lot of these ideas are a culture change, and its just a matter of getting the people who are participating today to just go that extra step, i.e., meetings being held in various sections of Town. He stated they should identify who the driving force is for these efforts. He expressed his appreciation for this report.
Councilman Strom stated this is a very dynamic group with a lot of diversity, excellent ideas, and an excellent report has been put together. She noted she would also like this to remain as an agenda item. She stated after the budget process is done, perhaps they could have a workshop with the Task Force and the Town Council.
Councilman Tallarita agreed with Councilman Fiore about keeping this on the agenda. He suggested perhaps in the meantime the Committee could look to see if there are any other grants available to help fund this process. Mr. Jones stated his belief this is something the Committee could look at.
Mr. Shanley stated his belief this process has been very interesting. He thanked Joan Smith who acted as staff on behalf of the Town in organizing things. He noted the document really does speak to the broad range of discussions that took place.
Ms. Smith stated the five communities will get back together in May to compare notes to see how other communities are doing and how they are implementing their plans. She noted a booklet is being put together by a professional to go out to all municipalities.
Chairman Vayda thanked the Committee for all their work. He noted this is a great report and a tremendous start. He added his hope this Committee will continue on.
OLD BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCL & TOWN MANAGER)
All appointments remained tabled.
Item c. remained tabled.
MOTION #5840 by Councilman Edgar, seconded by Councilman Strom to remove Item d. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5840 adopted 9-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: WORLD WAR II HONOR ROLL
Councilman Edgar stated the Council has a copy of the letter from the Memorial Committee. He noted the Committee is looking for direction from the Council on how to proceed. He stated they asked three questions regarding design, drainage work , and a target date for completion of site work.
Chairman Vayda stated his belief they need to nail down the issue of design.
Councilman Tait stated his belief they are at a point where they need to move this forward. He feels if the Council starts tinkering with the design, this wont get done. He feels the design is available, the site is available, and he feels they should get the site work done and get this moving.
Councilman Strom stated her belief Milone & McBroom provided a very good design that she feels addresses what the veterans were looking for. She noted this design is very similar to what the veterans had suggested with just a little modification. As concerns the direction they should now be going in, she suggested perhaps a resolution to adopt that design and hire an architect to fully develop that monument design with the site. She stated her belief that design would have to incorporate the size lettering they want. She added her feeling the Council should move on this fairly quickly.
Councilman Edgar stated the Committee asked him to point out that the design they have now is very similar to the original design. He noted the Committee is prepared to take a trip up to Vermont where these monuments are made. He added the Committee is waiting for direction from the Town Council.
Councilman Fiore stated as of tonight, they have not budgeted any money for this. He stated his belief they need to move very quickly and they should appropriate some type of monies. He pointed out if they are inclined to hire a professional to assist with the design, they will need some funding. He added his feeling that they should try to reach some type of compromise so that all parties are satisfied.
Councilman Falk noted this monument will cost $150,000 and he feels it should be done right rather than rushing into something that isnt appropriate just to meet a deadline. He went on to note there was some correspondence in the Councils packet that called this site a swamp. He noted he walked this area and he saw no evidence of this area being swamp-like. He added if there are concerns about wetness on the site, they could move the site 50 feet to the west and avoid costly drainage work.
Councilman Falk stated he had asked the architect to come through with some proposed alternative designs, however, he hasnt heard anything. He added he would like an answer to this question.
Chairman Vayda referred to Councilman Falks suggestion about moving the site 50 feet to the west and suggested perhaps the Council could give direction to Town staff or the architect to make the final decision exactly where the monument should go. He noted when he refers to design, hes thinking about the design of the layout of the surrounding area. He noted another consideration is the lettering, i.e., do they want to have a standardized lettering. He added he would like the Council to come to a consensus this evening.
Councilman Edgar stated the Committee is looking for direction. He noted when the Committee proposed the design, they felt that they had a professional who assisted them, and that person was Jay DAleo who is an expert in this field. He stated the Committee already negotiated the price of the lettering from $5.00 per letter to $2.50 per letter, and if the size of the lettering is changed, hes not sure if that discounted price will stay.
Councilman Kaupin stated his opinion that they will never get to the specifics until they have an action item list of everything that they need to do to bring this to a final decision.
Councilman Tait stated his belief a punch list needs to be drawn up. He added his belief things can move in parallel. He added he would like to see the Council come to a consensus this evening.
Councilman Tallarita agreed with Councilman Tait.
Mr. Shanley stated his impression items that can be brought to the architect would be to place the memorial on Site #3, give or take 50 feet on either side, wherever it would be most appropriately placed. He noted the second question would be which design the design by Mr. DAleo, or the modification of that design that shows up in the report. He added his impression that the size of the lettering will drive the size of the monument, and the architect will need to know the size of the lettering when doing the design work.
Councilman Strom stated her belief they were talking about the modified design that was in the booklet that was handed out. She noted although its not an exact replica, its very close. She added her belief this is a beautiful design that keeps the spirit of what the veterans had, while still fitting very nicely on the Green. She noted the original cost was for the monument, the site work, the granite. She stated now theyre looking at the design within the booklet that includes sidewalks, benches, etc. She pointed out all of that needs to be coordinated. She stated the Monument Committee had talked about the volunteers that were going to do certain things at no cost, and this has to be coordinated and tied together by someone. She questioned whether the Council can come to a consensus on the design and what the next step would be.
Councilman Mangini stated her belief they need to move toward allocating some funding at this point, but the question is how much and where in the budget will this funding come from. She stated her belief there needs to be a consensus tonight as to what that dollar amount will be.
Mr. Shanley stated the $150,000 he put in the budget in February was based on the numbers provided by the Committee. He noted the more things are discussed, its apparent that will not be an adequate amount. He stated if the Council wishes to use the CIP, they will have to discontinue another project because there are really no other alternatives within the CIP at this point. He noted its really up to the Council where they get the money. He pointed out the funds cant just be appropriated from the CIP, but rather it has to come from the General Fund to the CIP, or get rid of a project in the CIP and replace it with this one. He stated the definition of the amount of money will probably be dependent upon the final engineering, therefore, he suggests the first piece of money needed will be the cost of the architectural engineers.
Councilman Fiore questioned the purpose of the Memorial Fund, which contains about $24,600. Mr. Shanley stated he will research that question.
Councilman Edgar noted the Committee has presented a design for Council consideration and the Committee requests the Councils decision on that design at the earliest possible date so they can proceed. He noted if the Council is considering the other design, the
Committee would like to know that. He stated the Committee also requests that work begin regarding the drainage on the site. He stated his belief at some point in time when they were discussing this, they said the footing in that area is going to have to hold seven tons or more. He stated they need an answer as to which design they should start working on. He added theyre willing to go to Vermont on their own time and expense. He noted the Committee would like an estimated time when these requests will be addressed so that they can proceed. He stated they are still cross checking names for the memorial and theyre up to the letter T.
Councilman Tait suggested using the $145,000 funding in Item f. on the agenda for this purpose.
Councilman Kaupin stated his belief they need to put the funding in place, therefore, he would like to see a resolution at the next meeting for funding to take the first step. He stated his belief the first step is design. He noted his inclination is to go with the Malone & McBroom design, which is very similar to the original design. As concerns drainage at the site, he feels they first need to know the size of the monument before working on drainage. He noted the size of the lettering should be researched by Malone & McBroom.
Chairman Vayda stated he had no problem with the Malone & McBroom design since its very similar to the original design with some minor modifications. He agreed with Councilman Kaupin regarding the sizing of the lettering, in that they can get a professional opinion about letter size.
Mr. Shanley summarized as follows the selected location is a general location, and its up to the engineer/architect to find a place within 50 feet, east to west of that location and what is the standard or recommended size for the lettering. He questioned if the Council would like to see an interim concept before this is fully engineered, and the Council responded in the affirmative.
Councilman Falk noted consideration should also be given toward including some conduit for future lighting of the monument area.
Councilman Edgar requested copies of everything be given to the Committee to keep them up-to-date on whats happening.
Councilman Tait suggested there be a punch list with dates.
Chairman Vayda stated there will be a resolution at the next meeting.
MOTION #5841 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Strom to table this item.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5841 adopted 9-0-0.
Items e. and f. remained tabled.
MOTION #5842 by Councilman Strom, seconded by Councilman Mangini to remove Item g. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5842 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5843 by Councilman Strom, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO :Account 1700-332 $6,000.00
FROM: Account 1700-540 $6,000.00
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the amount of $6,000.00 is available from Account 1700-540 as of 3/5/02.
/s/ Gregory Simmons, Director of Finance
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5843 adopted 9-0-0.
NEW BUSINESS
DISCUSSION RE: IMPACT OF REVALUATION
Chairman Vayda stated Councilman Strom prepared a document for the Council that illustrates the impact of the revaluation and its impact on taxes. He noted this effects different people and different homeowners in different ways. He stated his belief its clear that according to this list, people are effected in a wide variety of ways.
Mr. Shanley stated over ten years since the last revaluation, different properties have appreciated at different rates, depending upon a wide variety of circumstances and situations.
Councilman Strom stated its very important that people realize that when they mention an average of 9%, thats not necessarily a persons individual taxes. She pointed out people have to look at their individual assessments and do those calculations themselves.
DISCUSSION RE: PEARL STREET SIDEWALKS
MOTION #5844 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Mangini to waive the reading of the resolution.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5844 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5845 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
Resolution re: Pearl Street Sidewalks
Copy Appended
Director of Public Works John Kazmarski stated they have a plan for sidewalk improvements on Pearl Street from High Street to the Enfield High School property. He noted the Town Engineer recommended waiving the bidding process and awarding the work to Lombardo Brothers, the contractors who are currently working in that area. He stated they wouldnt normally recommend such a proposal, however, Lombardo Brothers is an excellent contractor. He went on to note they also have a program to do some roadway rehabilitation on Pearl Street, and that is from Asnuntuck to Franklin Street.
Councilman Edgar stated when sidewalks and roads were discussed as relates to Pearl Street, he was under the impression they were going to do the small area in Laurel Park, however, it hasnt been done. He questioned whether they can include the Laurel Park area. Mr. Kazmarski stated Laurel Park is in the existing Lombardo sidewalk contract. Mr. Shanley stated he would check with engineering to be sure that section is going to be done.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5845 adopted 9-0-0.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
Councilman Falk requested the Town Manager contact the Chairman of the Cultural Arts Commission to see if people are interested in being reappointed.
Councilman Fiore stated Barbara Kelly would like to be reappointed, and Carol Plato has not yet returned his phone call. He noted Councilman Kaupin can call Priscilla McManus to learn if shes interested in being reappointed.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN MANAGER)
The appointment to the Housing Code Appeals Board will appear under New Business on the next regular meeting agenda.
DISCUSSION RE: FRESHWATER POND PRESENTATION
Present from Baystate Engineers were Harry Jones and Michael Proctor.
Mr. Shanley stated Baystate Engineers designed the dredging of the pond which is scheduled to be done this winter. He noted the permits for that process have been submitted, and theyve been responded to in part by the Corps of Engineers. He stated part of this evenings presentation is to allow them to complete the permit process. He noted this project only involves dredging the pond and up the brook a little way. He stated the second project that the Council funded in part was to selectively strip the vegetation from the side of the pond, eliminating all the non-indigenous plants and planting proper indigenous plants which will hopefully be low-growing and low-maintenance plants. He stated additionally, the Council budgeted funds for beginning the process of creating more of a park-like feel around the Pond after its newly dredged.
Mr. Jones stated they will be removing about 17,000 cubic yards of material. He noted that amount of material will effectively increase the amount of water in the pond by about 60%. He noted the design is fairly well advanced and theyve made application to DEP and the Corps of Engineers for their permits. He stated the other remaining permit is the local Inland/Wetlands permit. He noted they have not made that filing at this time because their jurisdiction not only includes the body of water itself, but also includes the regulatory area surrounding it. He stated there has been some talk relative to making some enhancements to the area around the pond, and if that is done, those elements can then be brought forth into the permit.
Mr. Jones stated they were asked to prepare a master plan of the park area. Mr. Proctor displayed the general plan.
As concerns addressing the adjacent areas to the pond, Mr. Jones noted they looked for opportunities to enhance the aesthetics to the park and to encourage recreational opportunities associated with fishing, skating, and walking. He noted they inventoried the existing conditions and facilities, and from that they moved forward with a conceptual plan. He explained the plan is based upon reconstructing many of the elements that are now deteriorated or are no longer functioning, and they looked for opportunities to introduce new elements and landscaping improvements. He went on to note in the overall plan, they propose reconstructing the walkway system because most of it is deteriorated, making everything handicap accessible, improving the lighting system, replacing fencing, etc. He added they would like to introduce a wooden boardwalk immediately adjacent to the pond edge on the north shore. He stated they also conceptualized an extension of the fishing pier out into the pond. Mr. Shanley interjected the key word is conceptual in that Baystate Engineers is providing an overall picture. He pointed out the Council has $200,000 budgeted, and Baystate Engineers will discuss what that funding can cover.
Mr. Jones stated they would like to add some park amenities, i.e., park benches, trash receptacles, etc. He noted as concerns landscaping, theyd like to fill in certain areas with shade trees. He pointed out there are a number of invasive species that are around the edge of the pond and into the stream corridor, and they would like to remove those and replace them with more beneficial wetland plantings and provide an overall enhancement for the area.
Mr. Jones stated the total project cost is estimated at $810,000, and that includes the immediate environs around the pond, plus about a 1,700 foot long corridor along the brook, heading back up toward Route 5.
Councilman Strom pointed out many other towns do not have fencing around their ponds. She questioned if fencing is necessary around Freshwater Pond. Mr. Proctor stated his belief chain link fencing was initially installed by the developer to keep small children out of this area.
Mr. Shanley stated fencing may be a concern to the insurance company since this is a residential area. Mr. Kazmarski stated the embankments along the brook channel are quite steep, and he would be concerned about walkways being close to those steep drop offs down into the brook. He feels the fencing along the brook is definitely a safety concern that needs to be there.
Councilman Fiore questioned whether the current dam can handle the increased volume of water. Mr. Jones responded the current dam will be fine.
Councilman Fiore questioned if there are some small cities grants or rehab grants available to address the other side of the pond. Mr. Shanley noted that has been discussed, and thats possible for DAleo Park as an independent project.
Councilman Mangini voiced concern about the legal issue of fencing as concerns safety issues. She noted there are small children in that area. She went on to question whether the water quality will be up to par after the dredging. Mr. Kazmarski stated after dredging the water quality will improve.
Councilman Mangini noted she would be interested in knowing the cost of maintaining the pond after the project is done.
Councilman Fiore questioned whether these are all Town sidewalks, and Mr. Kazmarski responded yes.
There was a consensus to move forward.
MOTION #5846 by Councilman Fiore, seconded by Councilman Strom to address Item f. out of order.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5846 adopted 9-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: WATER CONSERVATION
Present from Connecticut Water was Daniel Lezneski, the Region Manager for Operations.
Mr. Shanley stated the Council received a letter from Connecticut Water regarding the drought. He noted the Mayor requested a representative speak to the Council and that there be a discussion about where Enfield stands and what might have to be done.
Mr. Lezneski stated he is present to answer questions. He noted the Council was provided a summary of conditions regarding the drought they are currently in as well as a request to consider adopting ordinances for enforcing water bans.
Councilman Tallarita questioned what percentage of Enfield water comes from wells, as opposed to a reservoir. Mr. Lesneski stated Enfield has a number of sources. He noted most of the water in Enfield comes from Enfield. He added Enfield is integral with seven other towns as part of an overall water distribution system.
Councilman Tallarita questioned whether Enfield will be recommended within the western water system, or would Enfield be treated differently since most of the towns water is coming from groundwater wells. Mr. Lesneski responded no, it will be system wide.
As concerns the powers of conservation and the Town passing some type of ordinance, Councilman Tallarita questioned what type of controls and powers does the State have over this. Mr. Lesneski stated basically the State authorities would declare a drought emergency, but its up to the systems themselves to declare the level of condition and what the restrictions might be.
Councilman Tallarita questioned if Enfield has done anything like this in the past. Mr. Shanley stated that is part of the discussion. He referred to Hazardville Waters letter that the aquifers that they draw from for their district really show no sign of reduction, and they are not concerned about those aquifers. He noted if Enfield was a community that was primarily fed by surface water, they would have more concerns. He stated the question really is whether or not the Council feels the situation warrants taking certain steps as a municipality.
Councilman Tallarita stated his impression they have to be more concerned with the regional situation as opposed to Enfields situation. Mr. Lesneski responded thats correct. He noted if they got into a situation where they were restricting use, it would be system-wide, which includes the eight towns.
Councilman Mangini stated her belief the Council needs to thoroughly study the idea of adopting an ordinance, and she suggested the Council include this as an Item for Discussion at a future meeting.
Councilman Tait disagreed because he feels it will be difficult to enforce such an ordinance.
Councilman Fiore agreed with Councilman Tait. He added he has difficulty doing this for a private company vs the Governor declaring an emergency.
Councilman Vayda stated his belief they should be talking about what are some of the steps currently in place today and what steps should be put into place that will help avoid getting into an emergency. He noted he has an inherent problem with asking the police to go out and fine residents for violating a water ordinance. He added he also has a problem with neighbors turning in neighbors. He went on to note it would be helpful to have an education process about water conservation.
Councilman Vayda questioned if there is an ordinance in Enfield that facilitates the enforcement of mandatory water use restriction. Mr. Shanley responded he did not believe so.
Councilman Vayda questioned what Connecticut Water Company is doing regarding educating the public. Mr. Lesneski stated theyve included common sense suggestions for water conservation in their water bills.
Chairman Vayda stated his belief part of the education process should start at the school level.
As concerns enforcement, Councilman Kaupin questioned what the experience has been in Stamford and Ridgefield. He questioned if theyre actively enforcing ordinances. Mr. Lesneski stated Bridgeport and Stamford have some water use restrictions currently in place for a couple of their distribution systems.
Councilman Kaupin stated it might be a good idea to have an ordinance on the books in case there is a bad situation in the future.
Councilman Strom stated she would like more input from towns that have ordinances in place.
Councilman Fiore stated his opinion Enfield shouldnt be involved in this since he feels this is really a state decision that Connecticut or Hazardville Water should work out with the state. He added he doesnt feel this is a Town issue, and the Town shouldnt be into regulating resources.
Mr. Lesneski stated DPUC wont and cant allow them to enact restrictions, and that is why they are approaching the Towns to do this.
Councilman Falk stated several years ago Hazardville Water Company actually sent around a kit encouraging water conservation. Mr. Lesneski noted Connecticut Water Company did the same.
Chairman Vayda requested Mr. Lesneski keep the Council informed as things progress.
DISCUSSION RE: R2000 SECTION 7A
Mr. Kazmarski stated the biggest road in Section 7A is Bright Meadow Boulevard. He noted they looked at a number of designs with both the Radisson and the Phoenix regarding the installation of sidewalks to service those facilities and to give them the ability to have people coming from those facilities out to Route 5. He noted they recently received correspondence from the Radisson and the Phoenix, and theyve both declined their previous request to have sidewalks installed, and they cannot support them from a liability and maintenance standpoint. They requested going forward with the improvements of Bright Meadow Boulevard with the elimination of the sidewalks.
Councilman Fiore stated he would like to see the sidewalks installed in this area.
Councilman Strom stated her belief sidewalks are necessary on that road. She suggested maybe something can be worked out regarding maintenance.
Mr. Kazmarski stated if they were to install sidewalks, there is a problem with it from a physical standpoint. He noted probably the only way to reduce any kind of impact on abutting properties is to have the sidewalk not be a five-foot sidewalk, but rather a four-foot sidewalk immediately abutting the curbing installed by the Town. He stated this may require the removal of some trees which are about 12 inches in diameter. He noted if they go any further away from the edge of the road in order to provide a snow shelf, they will be talking about grading rights on the Radisson and CL&P property, the removal of their landscaping, moving fences, relocating hydrants, and taking down all of the trees.
Councilman Strom questioned whether this item can remain on the agenda so that the Council has more time to review this. Mr. Shanley responded yes, but they cant bid the project until a decision is made.
Councilman Kaupin stated he would like the sidewalks included. He suggested perhaps the Town can ask CL&P to donate the land to the Town so that the Town plows from Route 5 down to the Radisson and the Phoenix and the Radisson take care of their end.
Councilman Mangini stated her support of the sidewalks and pointed out theres a liability by not having sidewalks.
Councilman Fiore requested Town staff approach the Radisson one more time and share with them that there seems to be a consensus of the Council to go forward with sidewalks. He requested this remain on the agenda.
Chairman Vayda stated his belief they need to convince them this is for the benefit of the community and employees. He added he would like to see sidewalks in this area.
MOTION #5847 by Councilman Strom, seconded by Councilman Mangini to suspend the rules to address Items g., h., i., and j. under Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5847 adopted 9-0-0.
DISCUSSION RE: SUSAN CIRCLE
Councilman Fiore stated originally they discussed a project where they were going to put around $120,000 in up front money and probably getting $30,000 to $35,000 back so that the Towns cost was to be $90,000. He stated now the Town is looking at having to put up a potential of $232,000 up front, and the Town is going to be paying $155,000. He stated his impression they had a legitimate firm that provided basic quotes, however, its this far off. He questioned how these amounts have changed. Mr. Shanley stated his belief the original estimate was $132,000 for the work, and it came in at $172,000 with the bid. Mr. Kazmarski stated the engineering aspect of this entire project was reviewed by not only DEP, but also the Soil Conservation Service, and they were very comfortable with the design, and they stated thats exactly what they would have recommended. He noted they only had two bidders interested in bidding this, and the approximately $175,000 actual bid was close to $100,000 under what the second low bidder was. He noted the low bidder is a local firm. He added the other firm is also a very reputable firm that has done quite a bit of construction work in Enfield.
Councilman Strom questioned how long is the bid good for, and Mr. Shanley responded 90 days.
Councilman Strom stated she favors moving ahead with this project. She noted this work has to be done.
Chairman Vayda questioned if anyone on the Council is going to change their decision on this based on these numbers. The Council indicated theyre still willing to move forward.
MISCELLANEOUS
RESOLUTION #5848 by Councilman Strom, seconded by Councilman Tallarita.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO :3100-810 Public Works Administration $200.00
Dues & Fees
FROM: 3100-322 Public Works Administration $200.00
Professional Development
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify the amount of $200.00 is available from Account #3100-322 as of April 5, 2002.
/s/ Gregory Simmons, Director of Finance
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5848 adopted 8-0-0. Councilman Mangini absent at the vote.
RESOLUTION #5849 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Tallarita.
RESOLVED, that in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 8(f) of the Town Charter, the following transfer is hereby made:
TO: 3100-612 Public Works Administration $ 300.00
Office Supplies
3100-540 Public Works Administration $1,500.00
Advertising
FROM: 3200-350 Public Works Engineering $1,800.00
Construction Services
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify the amount of $1,800.00 is available from Account #3200-350 as of April 5, 2002.
/s/ Gregory Simmons, Director of Finance
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5849
adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5850 by Councilman Tait, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
RESOLVED, that the Town Manager, Scott Shanley, is empowered to enter into and amend contractual instruments in the name and on behalf of the Town o Enfield with the
Department of Social Services of the State of Connecticut for a Summer Food Service Program 7-1-2002 to 8-02-2002 and to affix the Corporate Seal.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5850 adopted 9-0-0.
MOTION #5851 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini to waive the reading of the resolution.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5851 adopted 9-0-0.
RESOLUTION #5852 by Councilman Falk, seconded by Councilman Mangini.
A Resolution re: Small Cities Grant #2001-049-001 018-0001A/Housing Rehabilitation/Lead Hazard Control
(Copy Appended)
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #5852 adopted 9-0-0.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #5853 by Councilman Strom, seconded by Councilman Tait to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #5853 adopted 9-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
|
|
|