|
ENFIELD TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 4, 2006
A Regular Meeting of the Enfield Town Council was called to order by Chairman Tallarita in the Council Chambers of the Enfield Town Hall, 820 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut on Monday, December 4, 2006.
PRAYER – The Prayer was given by Councilman Ragno.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL-CALL – Present were Councilmen Crowley, Edgar, Hilinski, Kaupin, Lee, Maxellon, Nelson, Peruta, Ragno and Tallarita. Councilman Mangini was absent. Also present were Town Manager, Matthew Coppler; Assistant Town Manager, Daniel Vindigni; Town Clerk, Suzanne Olechnicki; Town Attorney, Christopher Bromson; Director of Public Works, John Kazmarski; Deputy Director of Public Works, Geoffrey McAlmond; Director of Planning, Jose Giner; Director of Social Services, Pamela Brown; Chief of Police, Carl Sferrazza; Director of EMS, Arthur Groux
FIRE EVACUATION ANNOUNCEMENT
Chairman Tallarita made the fire evacuation announcement.
MINUTES OF PRECEDING MEETINGS
MOTION #8939 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Ragno to accept the minutes of the November 13, 2006 Special Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8939 adopted 9-0-1, with Councilman Maxellon abstaining.
MOTION #8940 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Nelson to accept the minutes of the November 13, 2006 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8940 adopted 9-0-1, with Councilman Maxellon abstaining.
MOTION #8941 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Nelson to accept the minutes of the November 20, 2006 Regular Meeting.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8941 adopted 9-0-1, with Chairman Tallarita abstaining.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Mrs. Collins, the Hazardville Section
Questioned whether the Council has any other meetings scheduled for this week, and Councilman Hilinski responded December 18th.
Mrs. Collins stated she had a difficult time believing the revaluation on her home. She questioned what company did this revaluation for Enfield and how the process worked.
Councilman Hilinski noted the Town Manager can explain this during Town Manager Communications.
Mrs. Collins stated she does not know how it’s possible to lower the mil rate to keep taxes down. She noted the Council should consider all the loyal residents of Enfield who have been in town and paying their taxes for many years. She noted many people are upset about this revaluation.
Watila Poppers, 67 Pleasant Street
Expressed her serious concerns about the dangerous Route 5/Elm Street intersection. She noted she was almost struck down by motor vehicles on two different occasions in this intersection. She stated most recently a motorist sped through the intersection while on a cell phone and almost struck her while she was crossing the road. She noted she is also very concerned about children crossing the road in this location. She stated her strong feeling that something has to be done to make it safer for pedestrians to cross this intersection.
Chairman Tallarita indicated the Town Manager will look into this situation.
Jack Sheridan, 7 Buchanan Road
Stated he has noticed the Solid Waste Committee is present this evening. He questioned whether the Council noticed there was a newspaper article about mercury contamination and the State Act being presented at the State House about trying to control mercury. He noted it’s also being recommended no one eat any fish out of almost all Connecticut waterways because of mercury contamination.
As concerns the unfunded aquifer mandate, Mr. Sheridan stated his belief the Town shouldn’t address this mandate at all because it is unfunded. He acknowledged it’s a good thing to be concerned about drinking water, however, it’s another unfunded mandate for taxpayers.
Mr. Sheridan stated his property went up 58% with the recent revaluation. He noted in order to keep his taxes the same, the mil rate would have to go down to 22.83. He stated he’s unsure how the Council can come up with a mil rate that’s fair and equitable to everyone if one house goes up by 80% and another house goes up by 40%. He noted it’s also known that more of that burden is heading toward homeowners because of what they’re doing for business. He stated his concern that if things keep going in this direction, the only people who will be able to afford to stay in Enfield will be those people making decent salaries.
Mr. Sheridan questioned what’s happening on the Town Farm Road bridge since he sees a lot of construction underway in that area. He stated his understanding work wasn’t supposed to be done on that bridge until the roadwork was done on Town Farm Road.
Margaret Jedziniak, 232 Abbe Road
Stated her assessment has risen 82%. She stated her understanding the mil rate might go down a little, but it would have to go down 19% in order for taxes to stay even, and she does not believe that will happen with the mil rate being over 36 mils at this time. She noted residents shouldn’t become complacent because they’re told not to worry since the mil rate hasn’t been set as yet. She pointed out every year taxes go up, and Town officials have the excuse of fixed costs. She noted that once in awhile, fixed costs should be negotiated in the taxpayers’ favor. She stated her belief the best and only solution is to allow residents to take back their government with the ability to vote on the Town budget. She noted taxes are rising according to what is spent, and the spending never stops. She stated her belief employees will be given another hefty raise this year.
Ms. Jedziniak questioned if temporary and seasonal workers are required to take a drug and alcohol test before being hired by the Town of Enfield to work on or in any vehicle or machinery. She questioned if these employees receive a copy of the Ethics Ordinance and are asked to sign it. She questioned if they’re asked if they have a driver’s license.
She questioned if Public Works has gone back to the old way of picking up trash. She stated she recently noticed the old, two-man truck method in use, with one driver and one man standing on the back. She explained that the truck parked on one side of the street, while one man walked across the street and dragged the trash across the road to the truck. She pointed out she is not complaining, but she is concerned about the safety of this practice. She suggested the Risk Manager look into this arrangement, and perhaps the person who takes care of the training in Public Works should address this as well.
Ms. Jedziniak stated she was not happy to read in the news about the unhappy firemen, and she hopes the situation is remedied.
She referred to the recent Connecticut Magazine article about the rating of towns as concerns schools, crime, cost of living, culture and jobs. She noted out of 24 towns, Enfield was fifth from the bottom in places to live in the State of Connecticut. As concerns the rating for leisure, she stated her perception the only leisure things in Enfield have a goal post attached to it. She stated her belief Enfield has hardly any other types of leisure for other people, i.e., a nice walking park.
Gene Fercella, President of the Enfield Chapter of the Northern Connecticut Chorus of the Barbershop Harmony Society
Mr. Fercella requested to speak regarding Item 11F on this evening’s agenda (Discussion re: Use of Facilities).
He noted the goal of his group is to return to the center of its foundation – the former senior center on High Street. He noted barbershop singing is practiced worldwide and Enfield’s chapter has a 50 year history, originating in Rockville and re-chartering in Enfield over 15 years ago. He explained this is a non-profit, all male choral group and has maintained a good relationship with the Town of Enfield and has provided musical support for opening ceremonies, such as the Fourth of July celebration and the Taste of Enfield, Holy Family affairs, Girl Scout awards night, etc. He stated they enjoy performing for the citizens of Enfield and would very much like to continue offering their services whenever and wherever requested. He noted their purpose this evening is to explore the availability of the old senior center on High Street and to request permission for the Northern Connecticut Chorus to use this facility one night per week for practices and one night in late May for their annual show. He noted historically, they brought in about 175 to 200 people for the May event.
Mr. Fercella stated besides being a sentimental and historical foundation for their chapter, this old senior center has provided a warm and friendly atmosphere that was not lost on their guests and the professional groups they brought in to perform. He noted more than once, they heard comments about how happy people were to share their talents with the Enfield citizens within a building with such a great sound.
He concluded stating his group hopes to be given positive consideration for their request.
Thomas Walsh, 6 Rosanne Street
Stated his home went up 82% in the recent revaluation. He noted the house next door to him went up 64%. He pointed out that since the last revaluation, the only thing he did was place a shed in his backyard. He noted he went from the fifth most expensive house on his street to number two. He stated around the corner from him there’s a house the same size on a quarter acre larger lot, however, his own house came in at $272,000 and that house came in at $232,000.
Mr. Walsh stated he did appeal his assessment, but he feels the Town needs to take a very good look at how these figures were calculated because the numbers are “all over the map.”
Mr. Walsh referred to the road improvement program and stated many newly paved roads are cracking. He noted this is because they paved over cracks.
Frank Dubish, 42 O’Hear Avenue
Stated he does not believe the Council really understands what’s going on. He noted he does not understand what right a business has to be in a residential neighborhood. He stated it appears no one wants to do anything about the business on his street. He noted it was determined his neighbor is allowed to have two trucks, however, this neighbor loads up equipment every day and has workers coming to this location to use equipment. He stated his understanding the Town Manager can only do so much with the information provided to him. He went on to note that nothing has happened since 1995, and this is his real concern. He noted everything was visible for seven years before the Town granted a permit for this resident to build a huge three-car garage. He pointed out the garage is higher than the home. He stated his understanding certain businesses are allowed to run out of a neighborhood, i.e., dentist office and day care centers, but not a physical business. He noted this particular business involves five or six trucks with plows, trailers, etc. He stated he raised the question as to where this business is being run from, and no one can provide an answer. He noted a town has to care where businesses are being run from so that they can tax those businesses and know what kind of equipment they have. He stated the question is whether this person legally runs a business out of a residential neighborhood. He submitted some pictures to Mr. Coppler.
He concluded questioning how Council members would feel about a person opening a business next to their home.
Mary Ann Turner, 7 Meadow Road
Referring to the Council’s recent workshop on goals, Ms. Turner questioned why “improve customer service throughout Town government” is a goal of the Council. She stated this should be normal doing business. She noted she would be interested to know where customer service problems exist and how does the Town Manager plan to make it better. She went on to note that on those occasions she had to work with Town staff, secretaries or clerks, she has always received exceptional customer service, however, she can’t always say the same for the Town Manager’s office.
Ms. Turner stated she finds it insulting that managers of departments would make a comment that Councilmen don’t have the right to ask a question and get a straight answer. She referred to Henry Dutcher’s comment that he doesn’t like Council members meddling. She noted this had to do with a Councilmen’s question about the Food for Fines Program. She stated her impression the Council was doing its job. She stated her belief Mr. Dutcher owes the Council an apology for this comment.
Ms. Turner went on to note that the Friends of the Library have given large dollars to the Enfield Library to supplement the Enfield Reads Program, and it’s her understanding that program was lost due to the budget. She noted when large dollars are donated, such as those donated by the Friends of the Library, those funds are supposed to come back through the Town Council to the General Fund and re-routed to the appropriate department, however, that has never been done, and this is something that the Council needs to consider.
Robert Tkacz, Bernadino Avenue
Stated it has been months since he asked for the accomplishments of the Town Manager, but he has heard nothing. He questioned if he has done anything. He stated everyone says he’s doing a great job, but what kind of job is he doing.
Mr. Tkacz stated a person on the Planning & Zoning Commission asked him what’s the function of the Zoning Enforcement Officer and why doesn’t he enforce some of the zoning violations in town. He noted he responded the Zoning Enforcement Officer has to get a written complaint. He went on to note there’s a used car lot on Enfield Street, and he has so many cars in this area that they’re parked on the sidewalk. He stated his impression this has to be a violation. He noted he will complain verbally to him in the morning. He noted this business is located in the northern part of Enfield near a rental agency. He went on to note Porcello’s garage has cars parked all over the place. He questioned if there’s anyone with any pride in Enfield whereby they would do something about the mess on Enfield Street with its zoning violations. He pointed out three-quarters of the businesses have no numbers for their addresses. He questioned when somebody is going to start enforcing all of these violations on these businesses in town. He pointed out residents can’t get away with this. He noted if they’re going to come down hard on residents, they should do the same for businesses.
Mrs. Collins, the Hazardville Section
Voiced her opposition to changing the names of buildings, i.e., the Enfield Day Care and the old senior center.
Margaret Jedziniak, 232 Abbe Road
Stated her hope the Council will not change the name of the Enfield Day Care because she’s concerned the school department will take it over. She noted she read in the paper that the day care can’t get enough participants, and it’s her understanding they’re taking out-of-town people. She stated her understanding they’re going to have to open up another one of the stores. She noted she already complained about this arrangement, and she’s concerned there may be a future lawsuit regarding this.
Mary Ann Turner, 7 Meadow Road
Stated the Council should remember at budget time that the community garden at the senior center location is not a Town of Enfield budget item, but rather it’s a private-funded affair. She noted she doesn’t want to see this become a line item in the future.
Robert Tkacz, Bernadino Avenue
Stated there are plenty of Mexican immigrants that want to move to Enfield so you don’t have to worry about people moving out, there will be plenty of people moving in. He noted you get about six families every house, so the population will go up to about 150,000. Chairman Tallarita interjected, “Refrain from that please, that’s uncalled for.”
Mr. Tkacz stated he asked the Town Attorney a question about the minutes, and he still hasn’t had any response from the Town Attorney. He noted people come up and ask questions, and they never get answers, and it’s wondered why the public is sarcastic to the Council. He noted people ask questions, they’re polite, and nothing comes forward. He stated he’s told his comment is uncalled for, but he feels non-answers are uncalled for. He stated his feeling the Council should respond to the public that takes the time to come to these meetings. He noted some Council members get sarcastic to the public, and that’s not right.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS & PETITIONS
Councilman Nelson agreed with Mr. Walsh concerning his comments about the road overlay. He noted his own road, Tabor Road, had an overlay and it’s cracking. He stated it may be a waste of money overlaying the roads, and they may want to consider stopping that practice and just address new roads. He requested this be checked into.
Councilman Nelson requested the Town Manager explain what’s going on with the Town Farm Road bridge.
As concerns the revaluation, Councilman Nelson stated everyone has their complaints about this process. He noted he received the evaluation on his home and his business. He stated the taxes on his business will go down because he was overpaying on his business for four years. He suggested people add 30% to their assessment, and ask themselves if they believe they could sell their house for that amount, and if the answer is yes, then they are being assessed right. He noted if there’s a problem, people can make an appeal.
Councilman Kaupin stated people from the Municipal Consortium for Fiscal Responsibility will be attending the next meeting. He noted he has been forwarding information from this group to other Council members. He referred to an article in the November 24th Journal Inquirer concerning unfunded mandates and noted he made copies of this article for other Council members. He noted if any Council members have questions they want answers for prior to the next meeting, they should forward them to him and he will send them onto the Consortium.
Councilman Kaupin commended Enfield Fire District #1 for organizing the Torch Light Parade last night. He noted they did a fantastic job of recruiting not only Enfield fire departments but out-of-town fire districts as well. He noted other participants included Enfield EMS, Building & Grounds Department, Parks & Recreation and the cultural arts choral group.
As concerns the revaluation, Councilman Kaupin stated his own assessment went up 116%, however, he did some work on his home. He noted a co-worker went up 89% and other people went up in the 50-70% range, therefore, it is all over the board. He stated people are concerned about the impact, and everyone talks about the shift from business and commercial to residents. He noted people have to use the appeal process if they don’t feel their assessment was fair.
Councilman Kaupin stated because of Ms. Jedziniak’s comment about DPW trash pick-up, he recalled that his recycling barrel full of leaves was dumped in with the regular trash on the Saturday after the Thanksgiving holiday.
Regarding the comments from Mr. Dubish, Councilman Kaupin stated the Enfield Town Charter specifically states what issues the Council can get involved in. He questioned the Town Manager and Town Attorney as to whether the questions raised by Mr. Dubish are answerable by the Town Council, or should those questions be addressed to Planning & Zoning or the Zoning Board of Appeals.
As concerns Town Council goals, Councilman Kaupin stated four of his five top goals were part of the final ten goals chosen by the Council. He noted one item which didn’t get chosen as a goal addressed a statement made by Mr. Tkacz regarding ordinances. He stated his belief the Council missed the boat by not choosing a goal to review ordinances, but hopefully they can still do the work. He agreed with Ms. Turner in that customer service should not have to be a goal because it should be a given.
Councilman Peruta stated the Torchlight Parade was a great event.
Councilman Peruta stated he also is interested in any work underway at the Town Farm Road bridge.
Councilman Peruta stated his belief customer service should be a goal. He stated he has had comments from people about Town staff providing great service, and he’s had complaints about people who haven’t provided such good service. He stated his belief the Town has to set a standard.
Councilman Peruta stated he found the comments about Mexicans to be quite offensive.
Councilman Peruta stated his impression road overlays were a good thing. He noted this process should be looked into.
Councilman Maxellon commended the Fermi High School Graduation Committee for their work. He also commended the Board of Education for accepting the recommendations of the Graduation Committee.
Councilman Maxellon stated as soon as there is more information about AMR/EMS billing, that information should be made public so that anyone having problems with billing will have a number or name to contact.
Councilman Maxellon stated this is the fifth time he raised the question about the income vs. expenses for Enfield EMS. He noted he received something from the Town Manager, however, he doesn’t believe the rest of the Council received that information. He requested this information be provided for the entire Council in the next packet.
Councilman Maxellon stated his belief the HVAC position for the Building & Grounds Department is still vacant. He noted he spoke to some Building & Grounds people, and he understands this is a position that needs to be filled. He added this is also a cost-savings to the Town and that’s why it was moved forward through the budget process. He suggested this could also be filled with another trades person, i.e., an electrician. He requested staff look at this a little closer and get back to the Council.
Councilman Maxellon stated his belief the road overlay program should be looked at again in the spring. He noted he has also witnessed cracking in the overlays. He stated his belief this isn’t money well spent, and he feels they need to come up with some other process or just save the money and rebuild the roads right.
Councilman Crowley referred to Ms. Popper’s concerns about the intersection at Elm and Enfield Streets. He noted about three years ago, they looked at some changes for this intersection, i.e., a timer which tells people how much time they have to cross the street. He suggested this be looked into.
As concerns the barber shop choir using the old senior center, Councilman Crowley pointed out there is a process whereby groups can go through the Town Manager’s office to apply for usage of this space.
Councilman Crowley stated he received many comments about the revaluation, and he believes those comments have already been addressed this evening.
Councilman Crowley stated the Torchlight Parade was a great success and all the participants did a great job.
Councilman Crowley stated he received a call from the Enfield Travel Basketball Association, and they’re having a difficult time getting a gym. He stated his understanding some elementary schools have available gyms. He noted this association is willing to pay for the space, but they’ve been told they can’t get a gym. He stated he will have the association contact the Town Manager’s office and perhaps that office can set something up through the Board of Education to see if this association can be assisted in finding a gym for their practices on Wednesday nights.
MOTION #8942 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to move Item 13D to 10A.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8942 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #8943 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to move Item 13E to Miscellaneous.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8943 adopted 10-0-0.
Councilman Hilinski stated his belief the barber shop chorus would be the perfect type of venue for the old senior center.
Councilman Hilinski stated his belief they may need to look at the road repair process as they go forward.
As concerns Councilman Kaupin’s comments about his leaves being thrown out with the trash, Councilman Hilinski stated he places his leaves in brown paper bags, and they’re always picked up separately. He noted perhaps the problem had to do with the brown barrel or single barrel.
Councilman Hilinski stated he also thought one of the goals should have been a comprehensive review of all the ordinances. He stated his belief the blight ordinances are inadequate in town because there are a lot of areas where there are homes and buildings that are not up to speed, but in many cases they do fall within the legal limits, which he’s surprised about. He stated his belief they could tighten up that ordinance. He suggested that since ordinances aren’t part of the goal list, perhaps they can create an initiative in certain areas.
Chairman Tallarita referred to the evaluation process and noted the whole Council recognizes the value of their homes have gone up. He noted if people feel their assessment is much different than others in their neighborhood, they should make an appeal.
Referring to the Connecticut Magazine article raised by Ms. Jedziniak, Chairman Tallarita stated his belief that was a subjective review of 24 towns. He noted he did not agree with a lot of what was said in that article. He disagreed with the comment that Enfield doesn’t do anything in the way of leisure. He stated his belief Enfield does a lot, i.e., the Fourth of July Celebration, programs at the Enfield Senior Center, programs run out of the Enfield Public Library, land purchases along the Scantic River in an effort to create a park area and the many parades held in Enfield.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Coppler responded to Councilman Maxellon’s comment about the HVAC position. He stated the interviews will happen later this week, and it’s their anticipation they’ll have that position filled by the first of the year. He agreed with Building & Grounds and DPW in that this is a very important position to have in terms of trying to reduce the Town’s costs and reliance upon third party contractors.
As concerns the Town Farm Road bridge, Mr. Coppler stated he learned Hazardville Water is replacing a water line that has been causing them problems.
Mr. Coppler stated he provided the Council with information about a free flu shot clinic which will be held Thursday, December 7 between 8:30 and 11:30 a.m. at Asnuntuck Community College. He noted pre-registration is required, therefore, interested parties need to contact the North Central District Health Department between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. He noted their phone number is 860-745-0383.
Mr. Coppler stated his office will get back to Councilman Kaupin regarding his question about who should be addressing the concerns raised by Mr. Dubish. He went on to note they will also have information in Friday’s packet concerning EMS revenue.
Mr. Coppler stated Jose Giner will provide a presentation on his department.
Mr. Giner provided a Powerpoint overview of the Planning Department which included the following information:
· A listing of Planning Department personnel
· The Planning & Zoning Commission
· Inland/Wetlands Commission
· Recent accomplishments:
$4,000 America the Beautiful grant
JFK workshop for residents with property on terraced escarpments
Bonding changes
Front porch regulation changes
Storage container standards
Commercial vehicle standards
Bernie’s special development district (similar to Bigelow-allows mixed use)
Revised subdivision standards
· Current happenings:
Aquifer Protection Ordinance
Plan of Conservation & Development
Certified Local Government
Stormwater Management/Erosion & Sediment Control regulation update
Support for town-wide GIS integration
Design guidelines for Thompsonville center
Councilman Peruta requested Mr. Giner talk a little about zoning enforcement. Mr. Giner stated the Zoning Enforcement Officer does have a policy that things should be submitted in writing otherwise they get a lot of back and forth neighborhood disputes. He noted the ZEO provides a written response. He stated if a person disagrees with the decision, they have a right to appeal before the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Chairman Tallarita questioned whether the Planning Department drives around town and finds violations. Mr. Giner stated he doesn’t do this personally, however, if he happens to see something he tells the ZEO. He noted the ZEO goes out on inspections every day and he believes if he saw something obvious he would address it.
Mr. Coppler requested Mr. Kazmarski provide an update on Northgate. Mr. Kazmarski stated all the trees called for in the original plan have been planted. He noted the sidewalk contractor had to leave the Town’s job for a commitment in Windsor, and this left a stretch of approximately 60 feet south of the I-91 bridge. He stated he will be working on the remaining 60 feet tomorrow. He noted there’s also about another 200 feet of sidewalk toward the northerly end near Sword Avenue, and if the weather is good, the contractor will continue and finish up the 200 feet of sidewalk. He noted if all goes well, the sidewalk work should be complete in a week to a week and a half.
TOWN ATTORNEY REPORT & COMMUNICATIONS
As concerns pending litigation, Attorney Bromson stated today there was an oral argument in the appellate court in Hartford on a Town case – Town of Enfield vs. AFSCME regarding an employee that was let go for alleged drug use. He noted the State Board of Mediation and Arbitration overturned the termination and ordered reinstatement, and the Town appealed to a trial court, and a judge overruled the mediation board and said the Town, for public policy, was within its right to terminate on that basis. He stated there should be a ruling in about four to six months. He noted the Council will be kept informed, and this will be posted on the website.
As concerns the question raised by Mr. Tkacz regarding minutes, Attorney Bromson stated some research was done, however, they didn’t issue a formal opinion. He stated the rules provide that they do not, or the Clerk does not need to transcribe a verbatim account of what occurs at the meetings, and that is not done. He stated the Clerk goes beyond the minimum requirement under Robert’s Rules of Order, therefore, the Clerk is in compliance. He noted they try to do their best to give a little flavor of what is said, however, they do quite a bit more in transcription than what’s required. He stated they did look into this right away, however, he apologizes for not getting an answer back to Mr. Tkacz. He noted in the future if someone is waiting for an answer, they’re free to call the Town Attorney’s office, and an answer can be provided.
DISCUSSION/PRESENTATION RE: SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
Present from the Solid Waste Advisory Committee were Chairman Robert Egan, Vice Chairman Mary Ann Abar, Vince Grady, and Bill Guzie. Mr. Egan stated Sal Fiore couldn’t make it tonight, but he has been active in the committee meetings.
Mr. Egan stated they did respond to the first three items on the charge. He noted they decided to hold off on the fourth item, which was a review of the town code ordinances, because the State is revising its solid waste plan, and there will be some drastic changes which will require municipalities to assume some more responsibilities. He stated the plan is supposed to be available in April, however, there’s no guarantee that it will be available at that time.
Mr. Egan stated the first recommendation was that the residential tipper barrel program should be made mandatory for the collection of residential refuse and yard waste. He noted the Committee recommended the cost implementation process be phased in over a three year period. He explained this would be for the purchase of the barrels and the purchase of the equipment. He noted this would be a semi-automated process for the first three years and be phased in to be fully automated as the new equipment is purchased.
Mr. Egan explained the Committee’s reasoning for the first recommendation is that the automated waste collection will be saving money and reducing the refuse tonnage that goes to the burn plant and there will be an increase in the rate of recycling.
He stated the prior Solid Waste Task Force had unanimously recommended and voted for a town-wide mandatory tipper barrel program. He noted that Task Force did a lot of study on this issue, and this current Committee took that information and updated it for this current period, and they came up with the same financial conclusions in that there are savings by going with the tipper barrel program.
Mr. Egan stated other reasons for the recommendation were improved worker safety because there is a reduction in workers’ comp claims and the improvement in the appearance of the town.
Mr. Egan stated the next recommendation is that the transfer station fees should be amended and he highlighted a couple amendments as follows:
· Tipping fees should be $5.00 for the first 250 pounds and .05 per pound thereafter in increments of 20 pounds
He noted it was the consensus of the Committee that the transfer station is a very valuable asset and could be a revenue producer for the Town. He noted there are various ways that could happen. He stated there’s the feasibility of selling, leasing, or the Town itself running the operation. He noted with the new solid waste plan that the state is working on, they seem to be getting away from the CRRA concept and with the lack of landfills, there’s going to be some severe disposal problems within the state. He stated the Committee thought some consideration should be given to the transfer station where they could realize some revenues and they could subsidize the services for the Town.
He highlighted the third recommendation. He noted residential recycling should be expanded to include the junk mail. He pointed out that’s a mandate by CRRA and the Committee is further recommending that a recycling coordinator be hired for the Town. He noted there’s currently a requirement that the Town recycles 25% of its municipal solid waste, and Enfield is doing somewhat less than the 25%. He noted the state is considering a 45% recycling requirement. He noted the increased recycling will reduce the disposal fee and the overall disposal cost. He noted the coordinator position will probably pay for itself many times over.
Mr. Egan stated there was also a consensus by the Committee in that education and enforcement will increase recycling and reduce disposal fees.
As concerns the Household Hazardous Waste Program, Mr. Egan stated it was the consensus of the Committee that this program is very accessible and cost effective for the Town and they did not recommend any change in that program. He noted the Recycling Coordinator would be involved in this as far as educating the townspeople about this program. He added questions such as those raised by Mr. Sheridan about mercury thermometers are addressed by CRRA and it’s collected on a Hazardous Waste Collection Day. He noted there is a choice of 18 collection days. Additionally, there are other collection locations such as manufacturer’s recycling programs, which the Town does not have to pay for, i.e.., mercury can be taken to Northeast Lamp in East Windsor, rechargeable batteries can be taken to Home Depot, Staples, Best Buy. He noted there are a number of alternatives to the 18 collection days.
Mr. Egan stated everyone on the Committee had some professional experience, and they represented the Town and taxpayers’ concerns. He noted this was a great Committee to work with. He also thanked Geoff McAlmond and Kevin Donohue for their assistance.
Chairman Tallarita commended and thanked this Committee for all their hard work. He stated his belief this is an excellent report from the Committee.
Councilman Lee referred to the figure of $660,000 for approximately 10,000 tipper barrels. He questioned if this is indicating that the barrels that the Town is providing to residents for $50 actually have a cost of around $66. Mr. Egan stated the prices have been increasing. He noted they started out in the $50 range, and it’s anticipated they will be $60 at this point in time if they were purchased.
Councilman Lee questioned the rationale that lead to the conclusion that the municipality should be paying for barrels rather than mandating over a period of time that each resident make that purchase on their own. Councilman Egan stated there was a question in a survey that was sent out in the voluntary test program, and that was one of the major concerns in that if they had to pay for it, it might not be the program for them. He stated the consensus of the Commission was that if the Town is mandating and requiring this, the Town should provide the barrel. He noted every town they looked at that had a tipper barrel program provided the barrel.
Councilman Lee questioned if the state requires a 40% or greater recycling rate, is it envisioned they might need to move to a weekly recyclable pick-up, or can it remain as a bi-weekly program. Mr. Egan stated there was discussion about the current situation with the smaller recycling bins and possibly there could be additional larger recycling bins provided, however, there was no discussion about increasing collection.
Councilman Maxellon questioned if there was any discussion regarding commercial contractors. Mr. Egan stated yes, they did briefly talk about commercial contractors. He noted commercial haulers do provide recycling services for paper, plastics or metals for their solid waste customers.
Councilman Nelson requested clarification that the cost of the tipper barrels isn’t $660,000, but rather they are looking at $1,010,000 by the time they have to pay back the residents who already purchased the barrels. Mr. Egan stated that was phased in, and that is calculated in the savings.
Councilman Nelson stated his belief that if the Town picks up the tab for all these barrels, it amounts to $1,010,000. He stated as a taxpayer, he would rather get hit with a one-time $50 bill for a barrel that he has to buy, rather than having his taxes raised $50 to pay for this because those taxes will never come back down. He stated as a resident of the town he has always purchased his own trash cans. He noted the tipper barrels are a great container and they have a ten-year warranty through the Town. He stated his belief everyone has to purchase a trash can, and he feels the taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay for this in their taxes.
Mr. Egan stated Bristol and Manchester have the tipper barrel program, and those towns provide the tipper barrel. He noted there are a number of private contractors that do the automated collection in municipalities, i.e., Newington, and they throw the cost of the barrels into their contract price. He added there are various ways of doing this.
Councilman Kaupin thanked the Committee for their work. He questioned if they looked at how many tipper barrels the typical home needs, however, he has seen some residences where there are multiple tipper barrels. He was informed the Town would buy the first barrel, and the resident buys additional barrels if needed.
Councilman Kaupin stated if the Town buys the tipper barrel, where would the tipper barrel go if a resident moves across town or out of town. Mr. Egan stated the tipper barrels are all registered with serial numbers, and Public Works keeps track of them. He pointed out barrels are registered for a particular residence, and that barrel stays at that residence. He noted if a person purchases their own tipper barrel, they can be given a coupon worth $50 which could be used at the transfer station, therefore, the Town is not having to come up with $50 cash, but rather they provide a service through the transfer station, i.e., they could use that coupon for a bulky waste pick-up, or they could use it to buy another tipper barrel. He stated if it’s used toward a barrel, it would require a $50 expenditure by the Town, but there would be no cash expenditure, nor cash or payments going back to those that purchased the tipper barrel. He noted they would have one year to redeem that $50 coupon.
Councilman Kaupin agreed with the recommendation on transfer fees, and he feels education is the key in reinforcing recycling. He suggested refrigerator magnets with information about recycling dates and items that are recyclable. He feels it takes education and repetition to get to the 45% recycling level. Mr. Egan stated that is why a recycling coordinator is very key.
Councilman Kaupin stated his belief the tipper barrel program has to be mandatory, however, he needs to be sold on the process that is set up for that program. He questioned whether the Committee believes the program can work if they make people buy that one tipper barrel. Committee members believed if people are told they have to do this, many people will say they don’t have the money, or that they have more important things to do with that $50.
Councilman Hilinski stated he likes the recommended changes in the transfer station fees. He stated he particularly likes the idea of being able to use credit cards because some people don’t carry a lot of cash around. He questioned what kinds of things could bring more revenue at the transfer station. Mr. Egan stated he doesn’t have specifics, but they are suggesting this be looked into. He noted private haulers consolidate loads, and they need to do this at a transfer station, and they’re willing to pay to do this, and it could be very lucrative for the municipality, however, they need to be careful and use due diligence in who they hook up with. He stated they should explore the use of the additional land which was purchased at the landfill, i.e., what’s the feasibility of using that land as a landfill for construction and demolition materials. He noted those will be severe problems for many communities in the State of Connecticut.
Councilman Crowley pointed out families produce a lot of extra trash during holiday seasons, i.e., Christmas. He questioned how that extra trash might be handled. Mr. Egan stated it’s possible the Town could consider a second collection during that season.
Chairman Tallarita questioned if the Committee considered setting a mandatory program over a certain period of time, i.e., three years from now. Ms. Abar stated there was some discussion, and it was agreed their recommendation is the way to go.
Chairman Tallarita questioned if they included the delivery cost associated with getting all the barrels out to residents, and Mr. McAlmond responded yes.
Chairman Tallarita questioned in looking at other communities such as Bristol, did they look at how that city got into the tipper barrel program. Mr. Egan stated he did get some minutes of a presentation that was made by the city of Bristol for the town of Plainville. He noted they basically said that in 1996, they were looking for ways to improve their efficiency, but they didn’t go into the process. He added the implementation process could be further explored by the Enfield Public Works Department.
Chairman Tallarita thanked the Committee for doing a great job, and he thanked Mr. Egan for doing a great job in keeping everyone together and on task. He acknowledged Geoff McAlmond also played a big role in this, and his efforts are appreciated as well.
Councilman Lee questioned how many tipper barrels are currently in use, and Mr. Egan responded about 6,800.
Councilman Lee questioned if any of those people returned their barrels claiming they liked the old method better, and he was told no.
Chairman Tallarita stated he purchased a tipper barrel, and he believes it’s a great process.
OLD BUSINESS
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
MOTION #8944 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to remove Item #5 from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8944 adopted 10-0-0.
NOMINATION #8945 by Councilman Hilinski to appoint Donna Barsalou (D) to the Human Services Advisory Commission for an indefinite term.
MOTION #8946 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Crowley to close nominations.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8946 adopted 10-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared Donna Barsalou appointed to the Human Services Advisory Commission by a 10-0-0 vote.
MOTION #8947 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to remove Item #6 from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8947 adopted 10-0-0.
NOMINATION #8948 by Councilman Hilinski to appoint Sheila Peruta (D) to the Human Services Advisory Commission for an indefinite term.
MOTION #8949 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Crowley to close nominations.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8949 adopted 10-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared Sheila Peruta appointed to the Human Services Advisory Commission by a 9-0-1 vote, with Councilman Peruta abstaining.
MOTION #8950 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to remove Item #11 from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8950 adopted 10-0-0.
NOMINATION #8951 by Councilman Hilinski to appoint Herbert Foy (D) to the Commission on Aging for a term which expires 12/31/09.
MOTION #8951A by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Crowley to close nominations.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8951A adopted 10-0-0.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared Herbert Foy appointed to the Commission on Aging by a 10-0-0 vote.
All other Town Council appointments remained on the table.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN MANAGER)
All Town Manger appointments remained tabled.
Item C. remained tabled.
MOTION #8952 by Councilman Lee, seconded by Councilman Hilinski to remove Item D. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8952 adopted 10-0-0.
Councilman Lee requested Mr. Vindigni provide an update.
Mr. Vindigni stated a meeting has been scheduled for later this week with Cox Communications so they might locate a room for the equipment, look into equipment that’s available, hook-ups, etc. He noted he met with the Town of Manchester regarding their live feed programming, and he’s meeting with Windsor tomorrow to go over their program layout as well. He stated he will also visit South Windsor where he understands they have live broadcasting on a modest scale. He noted he should have something in writing for the December 18th meeting.
Chairman Tallarita stated his understanding the Town of Enfield will be totally responsible for the content of Channel 16, including programming, once they assume the responsibility for that channel. Councilman Lee responded that’s correct. He explained Cox Communications wouldn’t want the Town to have a 24/7 community bulletin board, therefore, they ask for some measure of additional programming. He went on to state his belief one of the original motivations of the Council was to have the ability to provide live programming for certain public meetings or public events. He noted the only way to have live programming is to control Channel 16. He stated it would be necessary to purchase additional equipment for live programming. He noted the rest of the channel time could be static programming through a bulletin board or other pre-produced programming. He explained Cox Communications would provide a certain amount of software that would allow for someone in Town Hall to insert a tape into a deck, and that program would remotely start, and when that taping is completed, it would switch back to a bulletin board format.
MOTION #8953 by Councilman Lee, seconded by Councilman Hilinski to retable this item.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8953 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #8954 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin to remove Item G. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8954 adopted 10-0-0.
MOTION #8955 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Hilinski to remove Item G. from the agenda.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8955 adopted 10-0-0.
Items H., I., and J. remained tabled.
MOTION #8956 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Peruta to remove Item K. from the table.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8956 adopted 10-0-0.
RESOLUTION #8957 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin.
RESOLVED, that the Enfield Town Council does hereby approve the job description for the position of Dial-A-Ride Supervisor.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #8957 adopted 10-0-0.
NEW BUSINESS
There were no Consent Agenda items.
DISCUSSION RE: AMBULANCE HOUSING
Present for this discussion were EMS Director, Art Groux and Chief of Police, Carl Sferrazza.
Mr. Groux stated there has been discussion about putting ambulances in the back of the old fire house on Route 5. He noted they went to Planning & Zoning for a special use permit in July, 2005 for that purpose. He stated EMS is in desperate need of getting some of their personnel out of the 12 X 12 room they’re using at the Police Department. He pointed out at certain times of the day they have seven to eight people working in that 12 X 12 space, and this is not conducive to a good working environment. He went on to note there is also one office which he shares with the supervisors, and this is also a storage room. He stated it’s their hope to get into the back half of the Route 5 location so that they can move some of their trucks inside and gain some more storage area. He noted they have two trucks that are currently parked outside. He stated those vehicles are plugged in and heated in the back to maintain the internal temperature.
Mr. Coppler requested Mr. Groux provide some background history as to why the Route 5 location was selected. Mr. Groux stated they looked at the medical aid calls within Enfield and where they fell in accordance with the police districts because they’re all coded by the district that the police are assigned to. He explained there are seven primary districts within Enfield, and most of their call volume falls within the districts that border Route 5, starting at the state line and running just south of Post Office Road. He stated they don’t want to move their entire fleet because they want to be sure they have personnel on both sides of town. He noted they looked for a location that would give them secondary road access and they looked at what the Town owned that would serve their needs within that area, and this is how they arrived at the Route 5 location.
Mr. Groux stated they looked at doing the basic repairs at the Route 5 facility in order to utilize the back bays of that building. He noted another option could be the placement of a modular office trailer in the back of the Police Department to provide more space for personnel. He stated they received estimates of about $400 per month for the trailer, with a $300 delivery charge and a $300 removal charge. He stated this does not include electrical connections to the trailer.
Chairman Tallarita stated the Council typically works off a proposal which they can dissect and discuss, however, they don’t have a proposal with all of the options and how they might address this in the short term, in the long term or in its totality.
Mr. Coppler stated his belief before they get too much further into the development of a proposal, he feels they need to have a policy discussion because the early numbers on moving into the Route 5 building have been significantly higher than what was presented a year and a half ago. He stated in talking with different Council members, there may be a reluctance to invest a lot of money into something that may or may not be a long term arrangement. He noted this is why they’ve raised the idea of modular trailers because this will address the immediate need while providing time to look at the long term plan.
Councilman Crowley stated his belief there is an immediate need to provide more working space for personnel. He questioned whether all vehicles need to be housed inside, and Mr. Groux responded no, but they need to be kept heated.
Councilman Ragno stated he really wants to see this program run as it should, and he feels it’s critical they establish a centralized headquarters with a decentralized fleet. He noted he would like to see recommendations with different scenarios and the pros and cons, along with cost figures. He noted in the interim, perhaps trailers could work. He stated he would like to see a partnering with the fire departments in Enfield, and perhaps they could use some of the bays at the fire departments. He stated they need to be able to get to scenes quickly, and by having a decentralized fleet, they can have a rapid response.
Councilman Hilinski stated the Council leadership is 100% behind finding EMS a headquarters, and they realize the situation is untenable as it is today. He questioned if there’s a way to be conservative in the rehab of the Route 5 location so they can get EMS there as soon as possible. He added he would like to see some scenarios on paper and some more discussion.
Councilman Kaupin questioned what Mr. Groux’s vision is for the Route 5 location. Mr. Groux stated their vision for that location is that shift changes would take place at the Route 5 location, but units would be assigned to the Police Department on a rotating basis. He noted they’d still maintain the office at the Police Department along with one ambulance. He stated the long term vision would be a centralized location where they could provide some training space for staff with units staged in another section of town so that both areas of town are served.
Councilman Kaupin questioned how many other satellite locations would be required besides the Route 5 and Police Department locations. Mr. Groux stated they feel two are adequate to service the volume needs of the town. He noted the majority of their calls are in relatively close proximity to those locations. He added during the day, the units are often out on the road and not necessarily responding from their quarters.
Councilman Kaupin questioned whether the Chief of Police has any problem with housing a satellite EMS at the Police Department. Chief Sferrazza stated the staff that Mr. Groux has working for him consists of very nice people, and they’re very careful not to get in the way of the police officers. He added if EMS wished to keep a presence at the Police Department, that would be fine with them.
Councilman Maxellon agreed that something needs to be done because the system is growing and it needs to continue to grow. He agreed they do need to have a long-range plan as to how they will address the whole system. He stated he would rather look at the whole proposal in total so they can see their total cost investment. He noted he’s concerned they will jump to provide some housing right now, and then they’ll be sorry a few years later. He stated they also have to consider they have two existing tenants in the old fire house.
Councilman Peruta questioned the size of the trailers, and Mr. Groux stated a 12 X 60 foot trailer would provide two office spaces with a center crew’s quarters, and the supervisor would not be sharing the office with the director. He noted they would still have the internal crew’s quarters in the Police Department.
Councilman Peruta agreed a long-range plan would be the right way to go, however, he doesn’t want to be short-sighted. He noted there are probably a lot of requirements the EMS has for facilities, i.e., storage and training, and those requirements should be made known.
Chairman Tallarita questioned how the Chief of Police feels about a modular trailer being parked at the Police Department for a couple years, and would that infringe upon the activities of the Police Department, and Chief Sferrazza stated Mr. Groux spoke to him about this and they looked at a site for this trailer. He noted although it’s not an ideal situation, it wouldn’t be something that would hamper the Police Department significantly. He stated they could work with Mr. Groux on this.
Chairman Tallarita stated his belief Mr. Groux needs to sit down with the in-house talents to think this out and come back to the Council with more information so that the Council can make an informed decision. He noted there might even be another facility that could be looked at.
Attorney Bromson stated they have looked at the Route 5 location with Public Works several times, and he doesn’t believe the Route 5 location is the long-term solution. He noted the real problem involved is the timing and the constraints they’re operating under at the Police Department. He noted there are tenants, and it’s a major obstacle using the Route 5 facility for the short term. He stated hopefully by the next meeting they will have a bare bones estimate to be able to use the Route 5 facility. He went on to note the trailers might not be the most desirable option.
Chairman Tallarita pointed out there’s an infrastructure cost associated with placing trailers near the Police Department, i.e., hooking up for electrical, telephone, furniture, etc. He noted this would not be a three to six month solution, but rather it’s a year or two year solution. He stated if they’re going to go with the trailer option, that is a commitment for a period of time. He stated the Council would like to see details. What’s the staff recommendation, what are associated costs, what is the short term and long term solution.
Attorney Bromson commended the Chief of Police and police officers who have been very accommodating to the 30 additional EMS people.
Councilman Nelson questioned why they can’t rent space from the fire department for the short term. Chairman Tallarita stated that is something that has been put on the table before and is something for them to make a decision on. Mr. Groux pointed out one advantage of going with the trailer at the Police Department is that their license is for 293 Elm Street, therefore, he wouldn’t have to go out for licensing for a different location which could take 90 to 120 days.
It was agreed more information would be provided to the Council.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
CONSENT AGENDA
Consent agenda items will appear on the next agenda.
APPOINTMENTS (TOWN COUNCIL)
All appointments will appear on the next agenda.
DISCUSSION/RESOLUTION RE: HARTFORD FOUNDATION GRANT APPLICATION
Present for this discussion was Director of Social Services, Pamela Brown.
Ms. Brown explained they would like to submit an application to the Hartford Foundation to support the community-based transportation network that they just received a $50,000 grant from the State of Connecticut for, and they are required to have a $25,000 match which they’ll be raising from the community through private foundations, businesses and personal contributions. She explained the goal of the program will be a transportation system for seniors and for people who are visually impaired. She noted this program will not be dependent at all on any state or municipal funding, but rather it will be privately funded.
Chairman Tallarita questioned the possibility of this putting private carriers out of business, and should this program not work out, those private carriers would no longer be available. Ms. Brown stated this is a planning grant, and that is something that they will definitely be looking at.
Councilman Kaupin questioned what happens if they’re unable to raise the $25,000 match, and Ms. Brown stated they would not be allowed to accept the $50,000 grant from the State until they raise the $25,000 match.
MOTION #8958 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Crowley to address this item under Miscellaneous this evening.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8958 adopted 10-0-0.
Item F. will appear on the next agenda.
DISCUSSION RE: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY JOB DESCRIPTION
Councilman Maxellon stated he had made some comments and he requested the Town Manager include those in the Council packet. Chairman Tallarita stated in the interest of expediting this discussion, perhaps other Council members could e-mail their comments to the Town Manager so they can be included for the next packet so the Council can have their discussion at the next meeting.
DISCUSSION RE: NAMING OF 100 HIGH STREET
Chairman Tallarita stated if anyone has suggestions for the naming of this building, they can e-mail that to the Town Manager or a Council member. This discussion will continue at the next meeting.
DISCUSSION RE: SENIOR CENTER FLOOR
Mr. Kazmarski updated the Council on the senior center floor. He noted last Friday, the floor in the dining area was stripped and there was concern about moisture content. He stated an independent vendor performed the test and confirmed the Town’s test results that the moisture content in the concrete is actually low, and that is not the problem which caused some of the separation. He noted there is a very high PH content in the concrete. He stated they’re unsure what caused this, but there is a method of addressing this. He noted they are meeting with the Senior Center Advisory Committee on Thursday to talk about selections. He stated they’ve looked at a number of different products. He noted it’s their intention to get the new floor installed prior to their New Year’s celebration.
Chairman Tallarita stated a person from Enfield, who works for another community in Connecticut, read the article in the paper about the flooring problem and contacted him to let him know the other community had the same problem with a couple of their buildings and a solution was found. Chairman Tallarita noted he passed this person’s name onto the Town Manager.
Councilman Hilinski questioned the status on the kitchen floor, and Mr. Kazmarski stated they are looking at various alternatives for the kitchen floor, and in all probability they’re going to be going with a quarry tile installation which would be easier and less disruptive than a poured floor which would require the removal of all of the equipment.
Councilman Nelson questioned the time frame for this work. Mr. Kazmarski stated their goal was to have the dining floor done prior to the New Year Eve celebration. He stated if it’s possible to do the kitchen floor concurrently, it will be done, but they’re not sure whether that can happen.
Councilman Maxellon questioned if they had to disconnect and remove equipment in the kitchen, would they consider using building and grounds or partnering with the school department to use the school electrician. Mr. Kazmarski indicated most of the moving would be done by buildings & grounds, but they might also have to use some outside professionals. Councilman Maxellon stated his belief the school electrician should be capable of disconnecting and reconnecting equipment, and Mr. Kazmarski stated they could talk to Art Pongratz regarding that.
Councilman Peruta questioned the role of the Senior Advisory Committee in this instance, and Mr. Kazmarski stated this Committee has a strong input in how things are done at the senior center, therefore, they wanted to provide the Committee with a variety of floor samples to learn which colors or pattern they like.
Councilman Crowley questioned if flooring will comply with Health Department standards, and Mr. Kazmarski responded yes.
MISCELLANEOUS
RESOLUTION #8959 by Councilman Kaupin, seconded by Councilman Hilinski.
RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the Town of Enfield has determined that bidding Student Texts “Connecticut Adventure” would be against the best interest of the Town and therefore hereby waives the bid process in favor of using McDougal Littell, Holt Rinehart and Winston and Glencoe/McGraw Hill for these text books.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #8959 adopted 8-2-0, with Councilmen Edgar and Nelson voting against.
RESOLUTION #8960 by Councilman Hilinski, seconded by Councilman Kaupin.
RESOLVED, that Town Manager, Matthew W. Coppler is empowered to enter into and amend contractual instruments in the name and on behalf of the Town of Enfield with the Hartford Foundation for a Community Based Transportation Network and to affix the Corporate Seal.
Upon a ROLL-CALL vote being taken, the Chair declared RESOLUTION #8960 adopted 10-0-0.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
There were no public communications since it was after 11:00 p.m.
COUNCILMEN COMMUNICATIONS
Councilman Ragno referred to the area near the transfer station where families go sledding and suggested some stone be put down so that cars can park there. He added perhaps they can use some of the fencing from the school to quadrant off some areas so that people don’t dump off loads.
Councilman Maxellon stated the St. Martha’s Pond used to have night lighting for ice skating. He stated his belief the Town used to provide that lighting, and he questioned if that’s a possibility again. He requested this be looked into.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION #8961 by Councilman Lee, seconded by Councilman Crowley to adjourn.
Upon a SHOW-OF-HANDS vote being taken, the Chair declared MOTION #8961 adopted 10-0-0, and the meeting stood adjourned at 11:05 p.m. |